Biological Sex Is Binary and Rooted in Anisogamy
Authors:
- Tim JanickeTJTim Janicke
- Göran ArnqvistGAGöran Arnqvist
- Pierre‐André CrochetPCPierre‐André Crochet
- Patrice DavidPDPatrice David
- Philippe JarnePJPhilippe Jarne
- Jussi LehtonenJLJussi Lehtonen
- Thomas LenormandTLThomas Lenormand
- Edward H. MorrowEMEdward H. Morrow
- Geoff A. ParkerGPGeoff A. Parker
- Paul A. SaundersPSPaul A. Saunders
- Jeanne TonnabelJTJeanne Tonnabel
- Frédéric VeyrunesFVFrédéric Veyrunes
Open Access
- 10 July 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Ecology Letters
- Vol. 29 (7) , e70426
Abstract
The definition of biological sex has become a renewed focus of societal debate, fuelled by the conflation of biological principles with discussions of human gender diversity. Here, we argue that conceptual clarity critically depends on separating these domains. Drawing on evolutionary theory and empirical evidence, we maintain that biological sex is best defined as a binary classification of male and female reproductive strategies rooted in anisogamy, characterised by the production of two discrete gamete types of different sizes. We stress that gamete size constitutes the ultimate criterion for biological sex and that this definition applies consistently across sexual systems, from separate‐sexed species to hermaphrodites, irrespective of variation in karyotype, hormonal profile, somatic phenotype, or behaviour. Further, we emphasise that evolutionary insights offer a coherent explanation for recurring, though not universal, associations between biological sex and patterns of sex‐specific selection, sexual dimorphism and parental care. We conclude that the definition of biological sex as a binary classification based on gamete size is a powerful scientific framework compatible with the diversity of sexual phenotypes found in anisogamous organisms and distinct from the concept of human gender.Keywords
Funding Information
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐25‐CE02‐1229)
- Research Council of Finland (340130)
- European Commission (101171163)
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traitsTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2010
- A REAPPRAISAL OF BATEMAN'S CLASSIC STUDY OF INTRASEXUAL SELECTIONEvolution, 2007
- Oogamy: Inventing the SexesCurrent Biology, 2006
- Intensity of sexual selection along the anisogamy–isogamy continuumNature, 2006
- The evolution of anisogamy: a game-theoretic approachProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2002
- Mating Systems and Sexual Selection in Male-Pregnant Pipefishes and Seahorses: Insights from Microsatellite-Based Studies of MaternityJournal of Heredity, 2001
- The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insectsAnimal Behaviour, 2000
- The moralistic fallacyNature, 1978
- The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenonJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1972
- Intra-sexual selection in DrosophilaHeredity, 1948