Quality of Online Patient Information on Surgical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Comprehensive Assessment Using the mEQIP Tool
Authors:
- Marco MarcascianoMarco Marcasciano
- Martina AstolfiMartina Astolfi
- Medea PintaudiMedea Pintaudi
- Emanuele VittoriEmanuele Vittori
- Giuseppe Antonio D’amicoGiuseppe Antonio D’amico
- Alessia PagnottaAlessia Pagnotta
- Luigi BennardoLuigi Bennardo
- Michele Rosario ColonnaMichele Rosario Colonna
- Steven Paul NisticòSteven Paul Nisticò
- Manfredi GrecoManfredi Greco
Open Access
- 11 November 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (22) , 7990
Abstract
Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by recurrent nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts in apocrine gland-bearing areas. Surgery plays a key role in moderate-to-severe disease. As patients increasingly rely on the internet for decision-making, the quality of online information on HS surgery requires critical evaluation. Previous studies have shown poor quality and limited coverage of surgical aspects. This study systematically assesses publicly available websites on the surgical and reconstructive management of HS, quantifies their quality using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (mEQIP) tool, and identifies areas needing improvement to support informed decisions. Methods: Google, Bing, and Yahoo were searched using five HS surgery-related keywords. The first 50 results per keyword and engine were collected (n = 750), and 214 websites met the inclusion criteria. Sites were categorized by provenance (practitioners, hospitals, healthcare portals, professional societies, encyclopedias) and assessed using the 36-item mEQIP checklist. High quality was defined as ≥23/36 (75th percentile). Comparisons were made by publication era (pre-/post-COVID-19) and source type. Results: The mean mEQIP score was 21.7; only 51 websites (23.8%) met the high-quality threshold. No significant difference emerged between pre- and post-COVID publications. Healthcare portals scored highest (22.8), followed by practitioners (21.5) and hospital sites (21.2); professional societies (19.7) and encyclopedias (17.3) performed worst. Major deficiencies included limited discussion of surgical risks, quality-of-life outcomes, and postoperative care. Conclusions: Online resources on HS surgery are frequently incomplete and omit essential details on risks, recurrence, and reconstructive options. Surgeons should direct patients toward vetted sources, and professional societies should develop accessible, evidence-based patient guidelines.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Endo-lift Laser (Intralesional 1470 nm Diode Laser) for Dermatological Aesthetic Conditions: A Systematic ReviewAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2024
- A Systematic Quality Assessment of Online Resources on Eyelid Ptosis Using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (mEQIP) ToolAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2024
- Quality of online information about migraine headache surgeryJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2022
- Patient Impressions and Outcomes After Clinic-Based Hidradenitis Suppurativa SurgeryJAMA Dermatology, 2022
- Quality Assessment of Online Information on Body Contouring Surgery in Postbariatric PatientAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2019
- The New Trend of Pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction: An Objective Evaluation of the Quality of Online Information for Patients Undergoing Breast ReconstructionAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2019
- Hidradenitis SuppurativaJAMA, 2017
- Quality Assessment of Information on Bariatric Surgery WebsitesObesity Surgery, 2017
- Recurrence of hidradenitis suppurativa after surgical management: A systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2015
- Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the InternetJAMA, 1997