Merits and Demerits of ODE Modeling of Physicochemical Systems for Numerical Simulations
Author:
Open Access
Abstract
In comparison with the first-principles calculations mostly using partial differential equations (PDEs), numerical simulations with modeling by ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are sometimes superior in that they are computationally more economical and that important factors are more easily traced. However, a demerit of ODE modeling is the need of model validation through comparison with experimental data or results of the first-principles calculations. In the present review, examples of ODE modeling are reviewed such as sonochemical reactions inside a cavitation bubble, oriented attachment of nanocrystals, dynamic response of flexoelectric polarization, ultrasound-assisted sintering, and dynamics of a gas parcel in a thermoacoustic engine.Keywords
This publication has 166 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Adsorbate-Induced Charge Screening, Depolarization Factor, Mobile Carrier Concentration, and Defect-Induced Microstrain on the Size Effect of a BaTiO3NanoparticleThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013
- Modeling the Cell Cycle: Why Do Certain Circuits Oscillate?Cell, 2011
- Mechanism of single-bubble sonoluminescencePhysical Review E, 2006
- Model of single bubble sonoluminescencePhysical Review E, 2005
- A reduced model of cavitation physics for use in sonochemistryProceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2001
- Does Water Vapor Prevent Upscaling Sonoluminescence?Physical Review Letters, 2000
- The effect of evaporation-condensation on sound propagation in cylindrical tubes using the low reduced frequency approximationThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1999
- A strain-gradients theory of elastic dielectrics with spatial dispersionInternational Journal of Engineering Science, 1988
- Piezoelectricity and flexoelectricity in crystalline dielectricsPhysical Review B, 1986
- Ultrasonic Treatment of Specimens in the Electron MicroscopeReview of Scientific Instruments, 1966