Modeling the heterogeneity in risk of progression to Alzheimer's disease acrosscognitive profiles in mild cognitive impairment
Authors:
- Curtis TatsuokaCTCurtis Tatsuoka
- Huiyun TsengHTHuiyun Tseng
- Judith JaegerJJJudith Jaeger
- Ferenc VaradiFVFerenc Varadi
- Mark A SmithMSMark A Smith
- Tomoko YamadaTYTomoko Yamada
- Kathleen A SmythKSKathleen A Smyth
- Alan J LernerALAlan J Lerner
- The Alzheimer'S Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeTIThe Alzheimer'S Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Open Access
- 6 March 2013
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
- Vol. 5 (2) , 14
Abstract
Introduction: Heterogeneity in risk of conversion to Alzheimer's disease (AD) among individualswith mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is well known. Novel statistical methods thatare based on partially ordered set (poset) models can be used to create modelsthat provide detailed and accurate information about performance with specificcognitive functions. This approach allows for the study of direct links betweenspecific cognitive functions and risk of conversion to AD from MCI. It also allowsfor further delineation of multi-domain amnestic MCI, in relation to specificnon-amnestic cognitive deficits, and the modeling of a range of episodic memoryfunctioning levels. Methods: From the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study, conversion at24 months of 268 MCI subjects was analyzed. It was found that 101 of thosesubjects (37.7%) converted to AD within that time frame. Poset models were thenused to classify cognitive performance for MCI subjects. Respective observedconversion rates to AD were calculated for various cognitive subgroups, and byAPOE e4 allele status. These rates were then compared across subgroups. Results: The observed conversion rate for MCI subjects with a relatively lower functioningwith a high level of episodic memory at baseline was 61.2%. In MCI subjects whoadditionally also had relatively lower perceptual motor speed functioning and atleast one APOE e4 allele, the conversion rate was 84.2%. In contrast, the observedconversion rate was 9.8% for MCI subjects with a relatively higher episodic memoryfunctioning level and no APOE e4 allele. Relatively lower functioning withcognitive flexibility and perceptual motor speed by itself also appears to beassociated with higher conversion rates. Conclusions: Among MCI subjects, specific baseline cognitive profiles that were derived throughposet modeling methods, are clearly associated with differential rates ofconversion to AD. More precise delineation of MCI by such cognitive functioningprofiles, including notions such as multidomain amnestic MCI, can help in gainingfurther insight into how heterogeneity arises in outcomes. Poset-based modelingmethods may be useful for providing more precise classification of cognitivesubgroups among MCI for imaging and genetics studies, and for developing moreefficient and focused cognitive test batteries.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease dementia based upon biomarkers and neuropsychological test performanceNeurobiology of Aging, 2012
- Comparing predictors of conversion and decline in mild cognitive impairmentNeurology, 2010
- Heterogeneity in mild cognitive impairment: Differences in neuropsychological profile and associated white matter lesion pathologyJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2009
- Cognitive reserve☆Neuropsychologia, 2009
- Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using cortical thickness: impact of cognitive reserveBrain, 2009
- Clinical predictors of progression to Alzheimer disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairmentNeurology, 2007
- Associating functional recovery with neurocognitive profiles identified using partially ordered classification modelsSchizophrenia Research, 2006
- The apolipoprotein E ϵ4 allele and incident Alzheimer’s disease in persons with mild cognitive impairmentNeurocase, 2005
- Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entityJournal of Internal Medicine, 2004
- “Mini-mental state”Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1975