Cost‐effectiveness of ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care versus care as usual
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Vol. 7 (12) , 2042-2049
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feasibility and accuracy of a rapid ‘point‐of‐care’ D‐dimer test performed with a capillary blood sampleJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2007
- Risk Factors and Short-term Mortality of Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosed in the Primary Care Setting in the United KingdomArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2007
- Management studies using a combination of D-dimer test result and clinical probability to rule out venous thromboembolism: a systematic reviewJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2005
- Ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary careThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2005
- Evaluation of the Simplify D-dimer assay as a screening test for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in an emergency departmentEmergency Medicine Journal, 2004
- A new rapid bedside assay for d-dimer measurement (Simplify d-dimer) in the diagnostic work-up for deep vein thrombosisJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2003
- Combined use of clinical assessment and d-dimer to improve the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis (the EDITED Study)Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2003
- Deep-vein thrombosisThe Lancet, 1999
- Diagnostic strategies for the management of patients with clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosisCurrent Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 1997
- Markov Models in Medical Decision MakingMedical Decision Making, 1993