Experts and resource users split over solutions to peatland fires
Authors:
- Jacob PhelpsJPJacob Phelps
- Aiora ZabalaAZAiora Zabala
- Willy DaeliWDWilly Daeli
- Rachel CarmentaRCRachel Carmenta
- 1 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in World Development
- Vol. 146
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Global Challenges Research Fund
- United Kingdom Department for International Development
- The Frank Jackson Foundation
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Breaking the deadlock on ivoryScience, 2017
- Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental managementConservation Biology, 2016
- Advocacy coalitions, REDD+, and forest governance in Papua New Guinea: how likely is transformational change?Ecology and Society, 2014
- Conservation, evidence and policyOryx, 2013
- The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in Asia–Pacific: Critical issues for REDD+Biological Conservation, 2012
- The implementation crisis in conservation planning: could “mental models” help?Conservation Letters, 2011
- Biodiversity Conservation and the Eradication of PovertyScience, 2004
- Managing Tragedies: Understanding Conflict over Common Pool ResourcesScience, 2003
- Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met?Oryx, 2003
- Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodologyEcological Economics, 1999