Safety, time and cost evaluation of automated and semi-automated drug distribution systems in hospitals: a systematic review
- 19 March 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
- Vol. 27 (5) , 253-262
Abstract
Objectives To systematically review automated and semi-automated drug distribution systems (DDSs) in hospitals and to evaluate their effectiveness on medication safety, time and costs of medication care. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE Ovid, Scopus, CINAHL and EMB Reviews covering the period 2005 to May 2016. Studies were included if they (1) concerned technologies used in the drug distribution and administration process in acute care hospitals and (2) reported medication safety, time and cost-related outcomes. Results Key outcomes, conclusions and recommendations of the included studies (n=30) were categorised according to the dispensing method: decentralised (n=19 studies), centralised (n=6) or hybrid system (n=5). Patient safety improved (n=27) with automation, and reduction in medication errors was found in all three systems. Centralised and decentralised systems were reported to support clinical pharmacy practice in hospitals. The impact of the medication distribution system on time allocation such as labour time, staffing workload or changes in work process was explored in the majority of studies (n=24). Six studies explored economic outcomes. Conclusions No medication distribution system was found to be better than another in terms of outcomes assessed in the studies included in the systematic review. All DDSs improved medication safety and quality of care, mainly by decreasing medication errors. However, many error types still remained—for example, prescribing errors. Centralised and hybrid systems saved more time than a decentralised system. Costs of medication care were reduced in decentralised systems mainly in high-expense units. However, no evidence was shown that implementation of decentralised systems in small units would save costs. More comparable evidence on the benefits and costs of decentralised and hybrid systems should be available. Changes in processes due to a new DDS may create new medication safety risks; to minimise these risks, training and reallocation of staff resources are needed.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding the barriers to setting up a healthcare quality improvement process in resource-limited settings: a situational analysis at the Medical Department of Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, MalawiBMC Health Services Research, 2014
- Prevalence of medication administration errors in two medical units with automated prescription and dispensingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2012
- Implementation and evaluation of carousel dispensing technology in a university medical center pharmacyAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 2010
- Effect of Bar-Code Technology on the Safety of Medication AdministrationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- ASHP Guidelines on the Safe Use of Automated Dispensing DevicesAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 2010
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?BMJ, 2008
- Qualitative evaluation of an electronic prescribing and administration systemQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2007
- The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after studyQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2007
- Effects of an Automated Drug Dispensing System on Medication Adverse Event Occurrences and Cost Containment at SAMSOHospital Pharmacy, 2006
- Accuracy of adverse-drug-event reports collected using an automated dispensing systemAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 2005