Responsiveness of the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale to Monitor Clinical Recovery After Concussion or Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Open Access
- 12 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 10 (10)
Abstract
Background: The Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) is used to assess the number and intensity of symptoms after a concussion/mild traumatic brain injury. However, its responsiveness to monitor clinical recovery has yet to be determined. Purpose: To evaluate the responsiveness of the PCSS to change and longitudinal validity in patients with persistent postconcussive symptoms as well as to explore the responsiveness of other clinical outcome measures to monitor recovery of physical symptoms in patients with persistent postconcussive symptoms. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients with persistent symptoms after a concussion (N = 109) were evaluated using self-reported questionnaires at baseline and after a 6-week rehabilitation program. The program consisted of an individualized symptom-limited aerobic exercise program combined with education. Questionnaires included the PCSS, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Headache Disability Inventory (HDI), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) related to 1) neck pain and 2) headache. Internal responsiveness was evaluated using the effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM), and external responsiveness was determined with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) calculated using a receiver operating characteristic curve. The global rating of change was used as the external criterion. Pearson correlations were used to determine the longitudinal validity. Results: The PCSS was highly responsive (ES and SRM, >1.3) and had an MCID of 26.5 points (of 132) for the total score and 5.5 (of 22) for the number of symptoms. For longitudinal validity, low to moderate correlations were found between changes in PCSS and changes in NDI, HDI, and DHI. The NDI, HDI, DHI, and NPRS were also highly responsive (ES and SRM, >0.8). Conclusion: All questionnaires including the PCSS were highly responsive and can be used with confidence by clinicians and researchers to evaluate change over time in a concussion population with persistent symptoms.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- A prospective study of concussions among National Hockey League players during regular season games: the NHL-NHLPA Concussion ProgramCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2011
- Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disordersThe Spine Journal, 2009
- Self-report scales/checklists for the measurement of concussion symptoms: a systematic reviewBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009
- Psychometric Properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in Patients With Mechanical Neck PainArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2008
- Performance of a Decision Rule to Predict Need for Computed Tomography Among Children With Blunt Head TraumaPediatrics, 2006
- Methods for assessing responsivenessJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2000
- Headache Disability Inventory (HDI): Short‐term Test‐Retest Reliability and Spouse PerceptionsHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1995
- Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaireJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- The Development of the Dizziness Handicap InventoryJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1990
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989