Relational Frame Theory and Stimulus Equivalence are Fundamentally Different: A Reply to Saunders’ Commentary
Authors:
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in The Psychological Record
- Vol. 46 (3) , 489-507
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding and Sexual Categorization: A Critical Test of the Derived Difference RelationThe Psychological Record, 1996
- From Review to Commentary on Roche and Barnes: Toward a Better Understanding of Equivalence in the Context of Relational Frame TheoryThe Psychological Record, 1996
- 12 Naming and the formation of stimulus classes1996
- NAMING AS A TECHNICAL TERM: SACRIFICING BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS AT THE ALTAR OF POPULARITY?Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1996
- A TRANSFORMATION OF SELF‐DISCRIMINATION RESPONSE FUNCTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ARBITRARILY APPLICABLE RELATIONS OF SAMENESS, MORE THAN, AND LESS THANJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1995
- Complex Stimulus Control and EquivalenceThe Psychological Record, 1993
- A California Sea Lion (Zalophus Californianus) is Capable of Forming Equivalence RelationsThe Psychological Record, 1993
- STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE AND ARBITRARILY APPLICABLE RELATIONAL RESPONDINGJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1991
- The Verbal Action of the Listener as a Basis for Rule-Governance1989
- Verbal behavior.1957