Second Chance Grading: An Equitable, Meaningful, and Easy-to-Implement Grading System that Synergizes the Research on Testing for Learning, Mastery Grading, and Growth Mindsets
Open Access
- 12 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in PRIMUS
- Vol. 31 (8) , 855-868
Abstract
This article describes the synthesis of the research on mastery grading, growth mindsets, and testing for learning to produce a new grading system—Second Chance Grading. The system and the research it is based on are described in detail. Reflections on the system's effectiveness, impact, and reception are also discussed. Finally, the appendix to the article contains an F.A.Q. section addressing some of the common questions and concerns related to the system.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-AnalysesPsychological Science, 2018
- Test anxiety effects, predictors, and correlates: A 30-year meta-analytic reviewJournal of Affective Disorders, 2018
- Can mixed assessment methods make biology classes more equitable?PLOS ONE, 2017
- nullPhilosophy Study, 2016
- Mathematics Anxiety: What Have We Learned in 60 Years?Frontiers in Psychology, 2016
- Test-Enhanced Learning: The Potential for Testing to Promote Greater Learning in Undergraduate Science CoursesCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2015
- HEIGHTENED TEST ANXIETY AMONG YOUNG CHILDREN: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ANXIOUS RESPONSES TO HIGH‐STAKES TESTINGPsychology in the Schools, 2013
- Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: Long-term improvements from quizzing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2011
- High-Stakes TestingJournal of Applied School Psychology, 2007
- Effects of Frequent Classroom TestingThe Journal of Educational Research, 1991