Concomitant tricuspid valve repair in left ventricular assist device implantation may increase the risk for temporary right ventricular support but does not impact overall outcomes
- 2 December 2022
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 63 (1)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Tricuspid valve repair in left ventricular assist device implantation continues to pose a challenge and may impact the occurrence of early and late right heart failure. We investigated the effects of concomitant tricuspid repair on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre study enrolled adult patients who received continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices between 2005 and 2017 and compared those who received concomitant tricuspid valve repair to those who did not. Primary outcomes were early right heart failure necessitating temporary ventricular assist devices and right heart failure-related rehospitalizations requiring inotropic or diuretic treatment. RESULTS: Out of 526 patients who underwent left ventricular assist device implantation, 110 (21%) received a concomitant tricuspid valve repair. Those patients were sicker, and most had moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation. A significantly higher incidence of temporary right ventricular assist devices was observed in the group with concomitant tricupid valve repair (18% vs. 11%, P = 0.049), with a significantly elevated risk for temporary right heart assist device (sHR 1.68, 95% CI 1.04–2.72; P = 0.037). After adjusting for confounders, no significant differences were found in the incidence of and risk for most clinical outcomes, including right heart failure-related rehospitalizations (P = 0.891) and death (P = 0.563). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant tricuspid valve repair, when deemed necessary in left ventricular assist device implantation, may increase the risk of early right heart failure requiring a temporary right ventricular assist device but does not impact the incidence or risk of death or rehospitalizations due to late right heart failure.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcome of unplanned right ventricular assist device support for severe right heart failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertionThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2014
- Predicting Right Ventricular Failure in the Modern, Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device EraThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2013
- Surgical treatment of tricuspid valve insufficiency promotes early reverse remodeling in patients with axial-flow left ventricular assist devicesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2012
- Decision tree for adjuvant right ventricular support in patients receiving a left ventricular assist deviceThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2012
- Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: Incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2010
- Risk Factors Predictive of Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device ImplantationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2010
- Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist deviceThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2009
- Tricuspid Incompetence and Geometry of the Right Ventricle as Predictors of Right Ventricular Function After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist DeviceThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2008
- Risk Score Derived from Pre-operative Data Analysis Predicts the Need for Biventricular Mechanical Circulatory SupportThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2008
- The Right Ventricular Failure Risk ScoreJACC, 2008