Inhibition of ligand‐independent constitutive activation of the Met oncogenic receptor by the engineered chemically‐modified antibody DN30
Open Access
- 5 June 2015
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Oncology
- Vol. 9 (9) , 1760-1772
Abstract
An awesome number of experimental and clinical evidences indicate that constitutive activation of the Met oncogenic receptor plays a critical role in the progression of cancer toward metastasis and/or resistance to targeted therapies. While mutations are rare, the common mechanism of Met activation is overexpression, either by gene amplification (‘addiction’) or transcriptional activation (‘expedience’). In the first instance ligand‐independent kinase activation plays a major role in sustaining the transformed phenotype. Anti‐Met antibodies directed against the receptor binding site behave essentially as ligand (Hepatocyte Growth Factor, HGF) antagonists and are ineffective to counteract ligand‐independent activation. The monovalent chimeric MvDN30 antibody fragment, PEGylated to extend its half‐life, binds the fourth IPT domain and induces ‘shedding’ of the Met extracellular domain, dramatically reducing both the number of receptors on the surface and their phosphorylation. Downstream signaling is thus inhibited, both in the absence or in the presence of the ligand. In vitro, MvDN30 is a strong inhibitor not only of ligand‐dependent invasive growth, sustained by both paracrine and autocrine HGF, but notably, also of ligand‐independent growth of ‘Met‐addicted’ cells. In immunocompromised mice, lacking expression of Hepatocyte Growth Factor cross‐reacting with the human receptor – thus providing, by definition, a model of ‘ligand‐independent’ Met activation – PEGylated MvDN30 impairs growth of Met ‘addicted’ human gastric carcinoma cells. In a Met‐amplified patient‐derived colo‐rectal tumor (xenopatient) MvDN30‐PEG overcomes the resistance to EGFR targeted therapy (Cetuximab). The PEGylated MvDN30 is thus a strong candidate for targeting tumors sustained by ligand‐independent Met oncogenic activation.Keywords
Funding Information
- AIRC (11852, 15572, 9970)
- Metheresis Translational Research SA
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inhibition of MEK and PI3K/mTOR Suppresses Tumor Growth but Does Not Cause Tumor Regression in Patient-Derived Xenografts of RAS-Mutant Colorectal CarcinomasClinical Cancer Research, 2012
- MET Amplification Identifies a Small and Aggressive Subgroup of Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma With Evidence of Responsiveness to CrizotinibJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2011
- A phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of AMG 102 (rilotumumab) in patients with recurrent glioblastomaNeuro-Oncology, 2011
- Monovalency Unleashes the Full Therapeutic Potential of the DN-30 Anti-Met AntibodyJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2010
- A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase-10 (ADAM-10) Mediates DN30 Antibody-induced Shedding of the Met Surface ReceptorJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2010
- Down-Regulation of the Met Receptor Tyrosine Kinase by Presenilin-dependent Regulated Intramembrane ProteolysisMolecular Biology of the Cell, 2009
- A High Affinity Hepatocyte Growth Factor-binding Site in the Immunoglobulin-like Region of MetJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2008
- MET amplification occurs with or without T790M mutations in EGFR mutant lung tumors with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinibProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- MET Amplification Leads to Gefitinib Resistance in Lung Cancer by Activating ERBB3 SignalingScience, 2007
- Protein and cell membrane iodinations with a sparingly soluble chloroamide, 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-3a,6a-diphenylglycolurilBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1978