The Role of Electrostatics in Protein–Protein Interactions of a Monoclonal Antibody
- 18 June 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Molecular Pharmaceutics
- Vol. 11 (7) , 2475-2489
Abstract
Understanding how protein–protein interactions depend on the choice of buffer, salt, ionic strength, and pH is needed to have better control over protein solution behavior. Here, we have characterized the pH and ionic strength dependence of protein–protein interactions in terms of an interaction parameter kD obtained from dynamic light scattering and the osmotic second virial coefficient B22 measured by static light scattering. A simplified protein–protein interaction model based on a Baxter adhesive potential and an electric double layer force is used to separate out the contributions of longer-ranged electrostatic interactions from short-ranged attractive forces. The ionic strength dependence of protein–protein interactions for solutions at pH 6.5 and below can be accurately captured using a Deryaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek (DLVO) potential to describe the double layer forces. In solutions at pH 9, attractive electrostatics occur over the ionic strength range of 5–275 mM. At intermediate pH values (7.25 to 8.5), there is a crossover effect characterized by a nonmonotonic ionic strength dependence of protein–protein interactions, which can be rationalized by the competing effects of long-ranged repulsive double layer forces at low ionic strength and a shorter ranged electrostatic attraction, which dominates above a critical ionic strength. The change of interactions from repulsive to attractive indicates a concomitant change in the angular dependence of protein–protein interaction from isotropic to anisotropic. In the second part of the paper, we show how the Baxter adhesive potential can be used to predict values of kD from fitting to B22 measurements, thus providing a molecular basis for the linear correlation between the two protein–protein interaction parameters.Keywords
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- High‐Throughput Assessment of Thermal and Colloidal Stability Parameters for Monoclonal Antibody FormulationsJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2011
- Opalescence of an IgG2 monoclonal antibody solution as it relates to liquid–liquid phase separationJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2011
- Behavior of Monoclonal Antibodies: Relation Between the Second Virial Coefficient (B 2) at Low Concentrations and Aggregation Propensity and Viscosity at High ConcentrationsPharmaceutical Research, 2011
- Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of a Monoclonal Antibody and Nonmonotonic Influence of Hofmeister AnionsBiophysical Journal, 2010
- Interactions and phase behavior of a monoclonal antibodyBiotechnology Progress, 2010
- Diffusion and Sedimentation Interaction Parameters for Measuring the Second Virial Coefficient and Their Utility as Predictors of Protein AggregationBiophysical Journal, 2010
- Phase Separation of an IgG1 Antibody Solution under a Low Ionic Strength ConditionPharmaceutical Research, 2010
- Understanding and Modulating Opalescence and Viscosity in a Monoclonal Antibody FormulationJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2010
- Phase Behavior of an Intact Monoclonal AntibodyBiophysical Journal, 2007
- Opalescent Appearance of an IgG1 Antibody at High Concentrations and Its Relationship to Noncovalent AssociationPharmaceutical Research, 2004