A Comparison in Adolescents of Composite Auditory Evoked Potential Index and Bispectral Index During Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia for Scoliosis Surgery with Intraoperative Wake-Up Test
Authors:
- Heleen J. Blussé van Oud-AlblasHOHeleen J. Blussé van Oud-Alblas
- Jeroen W. B. PetersJPJeroen W. B. Peters
- Tom G. de LeeuwTLTom G. de Leeuw
- Kris T. A. VermeylenKVKris T. A. Vermeylen
- Luuk W. L. de KlerkLKLuuk W. L. de Klerk
- Dick TibboelDTDick Tibboel
- Jan KleinJKJan Klein
- Frank WeberFWFrank Weber
- 1 November 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 107 (5) , 1683-1688
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The electroencephalogram-derived Bispectral Index (BIS), and the composite A-line ARX index (cAAI), derived from the electroencephalogram and auditory evoked potentials, have been promoted as anesthesia depth monitors. Using an intraoperative wake-up test, we compared the performance of both indices in distinguishing different hypnotic states, as evaluated by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale, in children and adolescents during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for scoliosis surgery. Postoperative explicit recall was also evaluated. METHODS: Twenty patients (aged 10–20 yr) were enrolled. Prediction probabilities were calculated for induction, wake-up test, and emergence. BIS and cAAI were compared at the start of the wake-up test, at purposeful movement to command, and after the patient was reanesthetized. During the wake-up test, patients were instructed to remember a color, and were then interviewed for explicit recall. RESULTS: Prediction probabilities of BIS and cAAI for induction were 0.82 and 0.63 (P < 0.001), for the wake-up test, 0.78 and 0.79 (P < 0.001), and 0.74 and 0.78 for emergence (P < 0.001). During the wake-up test, a significant increase in mean BIS and cAAI (P < 0.05) was demonstrated at purposeful movement, followed by a significant decline after reintroduction of anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: During induction, BIS performed better than cAAI. Although cAAI was statistically a better discriminator for the level of consciousness during the wake-up test and emergence, these differences do not appear to be clinically meaningful. Both indices increased during the wake-up test, indicating a higher level of consciousness. No explicit recall was demonstrated.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- AEP-monitor/2 derived, composite auditory evoked potential index (AAI-1.6) and bispectral index as predictors of sevoflurane concentration in childrenPediatric Anesthesia, 2007
- Cerebral State Index during Propofol AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 2006
- New Composite Index Based on Midlatency Auditory Evoked Potential and Electroencephalographic Parameters to Optimize Correlation with Propofol Effect Site ConcentrationAnesthesiology, 2005
- Impact of the AEP‐Monitor/2‐derived composite auditory‐evoked potential index on propofol consumption and emergence times during total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in childrenActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2005
- Performance of the ARX-derived Auditory Evoked Potential Index as an Indicator of Anesthetic DepthAnesthesiology, 2002
- Depth of sedation in children undergoing computed tomography: validity and reliability of the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS)British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2002
- The auditory evoked response as an awareness monitor during anaesthesiaBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001
- The Comparative Amnestic Effects of Midazolam, Propofol, Thiopental, and Fentanyl at Equisedative ConcentrationsAnesthesiology, 1997
- EEG AND MEMORY EFFECTS OF LOW-DOSE INFUSIONS OF PROPOFOL †British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1992
- A SIMPLE STUDY OF AWARENESS AND DREAMING DURING ANAESTHESIABritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1970