Indigenous Land and Sea Management Programs (ILSMPs) Enhance the Wellbeing of Indigenous Australians
Authors:
- Silva LarsonSLSilva Larson
- Natalie StoecklNSNatalie Stoeckl
- Diane JarvisDJDiane Jarvis
- Jane AddisonJAJane Addison
- Daniel GraingerDGDaniel Grainger
- Felecia Watkin LuiFLFelecia Watkin Lui
- Walalakoo Aboriginal CorporationWCWalalakoo Aboriginal Corporation
- Bunuba Dawangarri Aboriginal Corporation RNTBCBRBunuba Dawangarri Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC
- Ewamian Aboriginal Corporation RNTBCEREwamian Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC
- Yanunijarra Aboriginal Corporation RNTBCYRYanunijarra Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC
Open Access
- 23 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 17 (1) , 125
Abstract
Conservation and environmental management have been reported as offering opportunities to substantially improve the wellbeing of Indigenous people. Using the holistic wellbeing impact evaluation (W-IE) approach—well suited for use in Indigenous communities—we interviewed 190 Indigenous Australians across four communities. All communities were involved in the Indigenous land and sea management programs (ILSMPs). Our study explored the conceptualisation of ‘wellbeing’ by participants. In particular, we were interested in the aspects of wellbeing perceived to be affected by ILSMPs. Out of the 26 wellbeing factors explored, ‘Health centres’; ‘Language’; ‘Schools’; and ‘Safe community’ emerged as being of highest importance to the largest percentage of the respondents. When grouped using principle components analysis (PCA), the ‘Community and society’ domain emerged as the most important; accounting for 52% of the overall importance of all wellbeing factors. The second most important domain was the ‘Country and culture’, contributing 31%. Lastly, ‘Economic aspects’ contributed only 17%. Respondents believed that ILSMPs have played a considerable causal role in improving wellbeing, by positively changing factors most important to them. Specifically, 73% of perceived causal links were related to improvements in the ‘Country and Culture’ and 23% to ‘Community and Society’ domain. We thus conclude that land management for Indigenous people is much more than ecological or environmental management with ILSMPs, perceived to cause a wide range of cultural and social benefits. We also propose ways in which the future design of such programs could be improved to further increase benefits.Keywords
Funding Information
- Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP) through the Northern Australia Environmental Resources Hub (Project 5-3)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The ability of community based natural resource management to contribute to development as freedom and the role of accessWorld Development, 2019
- Are Indigenous land and sea management programs a pathway to Indigenous economic independence?The Rangeland Journal, 2018
- Using measures of wellbeing for impact evaluation: Proof of concept developed with an Indigenous community undertaking land management programs in northern AustraliaAMBIO, 2018
- Identifying and categorizing cobenefits in state-supported Australian indigenous environmental management programs: international research implicationsEcology and Society, 2017
- Rethinkingcommunityin community-based natural resource managementCommunity Development, 2013
- A Typology of Indigenous Engagement in Australian Environmental Management: Implications for Knowledge Integration and Social-ecological System SustainabilityEcology and Society, 2012
- Co-management and Indigenous protected areas in Australia: achievements and ways forwardAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management, 2009
- Social‐Psychological Principles of Community‐Based Conservation and Conservancy Motivation: Attaining Goals within an Autonomy‐Supportive EnvironmentConservation Biology, 2008
- Indigenous Populations and Sustainable Development: Building on Indigenous Approaches to Holistic, Self-Determined DevelopmentWorld Development, 2000
- Representing communities: Histories and politics of community‐based natural resource managementSociety & Natural Resources, 1998