Dual Band Antenna Design and Prediction of Resonance Frequency Using Machine Learning Approaches
Authors:
- Ashraful HaqueAshraful Haque
- Nayan SarkerNayan Sarker
- Narinderjit Singh Sawaran SinghNarinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh
- Afzalur RahmanAfzalur Rahman
- Nahid HasanNahid Hasan
- Mirajul IslamMirajul Islam
- Mohd Azman ZakariyaMohd Azman Zakariya
- Liton Chandra PaulLiton Chandra Paul
- Adiba Haque SharkerAdiba Haque Sharker
- Ghulam E. Mustafa AbroGhulam E. Mustafa Abro
- HannanHannan
- Ripon PkRipon Pk
Open Access
- 18 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 12 (20) , 10505
Abstract
An inset fed-microstrip patch antenna (MPA) with a partial ground structure is constructed and evaluated in this paper. This article covers how to evaluate the performance of the designed antenna by using a combination of simulation, measurement, creation of the RLC equivalent circuit model, and the implementation of machine learning approaches. The MPA’s measured frequency range is 7.9–14.6 GHz, while its simulated frequency range is 8.35–14.25 GHz in CST microwave studio (CST MWS) 2018. The measured and simulated bandwidths are 6.7 GHz and 5.9 GHz, respectively. The antenna substrate is composed of FR-4 Epoxy, which has a dielectric constant of 4.4 and a loss tangent of 0.02. The equivalent model of the proposed MPA is developed by using an advanced design system (ADS) to compare the resonance frequencies obtained by using CST. In addition, the measured return loss of the prototype is compared with the simulated return loss observed by using CST and ADS. At the end, 86 data samples are gathered through the simulation by using CST MWS, and seven machine learning (ML) approaches, such as convolutional neural network (CNN), linear regression (LR), random forest regression (RFR), decision tree regression (DTR), lasso regression, ridge regression, and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) regression, are applied to estimate the resonant frequency of the patch antenna. The performance of the seven ML models is evaluated based on mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and variance score. Among the seven ML models, the prediction result of DTR (MSE = 0.71%, MAE = 5.63%, RMSE = 8.42%, and var score = 99.68%) is superior to other ML models. In conclusion, the proposed antenna is a strong contender for operating at the entire X-band and lower portion of the Ku-band frequencies, as evidenced by the simulation results through CST and ADS, it measured and predicted results using machine learning approaches.Keywords
Funding Information
- INTI International University
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regression tree ensembles for wind energy and solar radiation predictionNeurocomputing, 2019
- A review on microstrip patch antenna and feeding techniquesInternational Journal of Information Technology, 2018
- New Concept of Telemetry X-Band Circularly Polarized Antenna Payload for CubeSatIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 2017
- Modelling of impact of water quality on infiltration rate of soil by random forest regressionModeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2017
- A Decision Tree Regression based Approach for the Number of Software Faults PredictionACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2016
- Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literatureGeoscientific Model Development, 2014
- Design Method for Circularly Polarized Fabry–Perot Cavity AntennasIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2013
- Effect of superstrate material on a high‐gain antenna using array of parasitic patchesMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters, 2009
- Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performanceClimate Research, 2005
- Partially reflecting sheet arraysIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 1956