Red Box, Green Box: Psychometric evaluation of a self‐report behavioral frequency measurement approach for behavioral addictions research
Open Access
Abstract
Aims: The behavioral addictions field lacks clinically useful behavior frequency measures. This study evaluated the psychometric performance of the new ‘Red Box, Green Box’ method for measuring gaming behavior with a focus on its utility for gaming disorder (GD) screening. Design, setting and participants: A prospective, cross‐sectional survey study was conducted using an online crowdsourcing platform. Participants were 1149 male gamers aged 18–35 years from Australia, Canada, United States, United Kingdom and Asia, reporting ≥12 hours of weekly gaming. Measurements: Gaming time was measured using a conventional weekly hours item, Red Box hours (gaming instead of fulfilling responsibilities) and Green Box hours (gaming during free or leisure time). GD was assessed by the Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT‐10), with International Classification of Diseases , 11th Revision (ICD‐11) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM‐5‐TR) scoring approaches. Psychological distress [Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale ‐ 21 Items (DASS‐21)] and impulsivity [Barratt Impulsiveness Scale–short form (BIS‐15)] were measured. Findings: Gamers with GD reported higher Red Box hours [mean ( M ) = 21.1, standard deviation (SD) = 11.3] than those without ( M = 8.7, SD = 8.4; P < 0.001), and greater Red Box proportion (41.9% vs. 26.8%; P < 0.001). Red Box hours demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy for GD [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.86, sensitivity = 0.94, specificity = 0.63] and Internet gaming disorder (IGD) (AUC = 0.76, sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.56), outperforming comparative measures. A Red Box response of ≥ 9.5 hours had a 94% likelihood of indicating ICD‐11 GD. Conclusions: The ‘Red Box, Green Box’ method appears to effectively identify International Classification of Diseases , 11th Revision, gaming disorder risk among males. Red Box hours demonstrated greater classification validity than the conventional weekly hours approach. This method provides a simple tool for epidemiological research, routine screening (e.g. outpatient consultation) and clinical assessment and treatment planning. Further validation in clinical populations and longitudinal studies is needed.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (2033280)
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevention Strategies to Address Problematic Gaming: An Evaluation of Strategy Support Among Habitual and Problem GamersJournal of Prevention, 2021
- The Role of Avoidance Coping and Escape Motives in Problematic Online Gaming: A Systematic Literature ReviewInternational Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2020
- Taking Gaming Disorder Treatment to the Next LevelJAMA Psychiatry, 2020
- High Involvement Versus Pathological Involvement in Video Games: a Crucial Distinction for Ensuring the Validity and Utility of Gaming DisorderCurrent Addiction Reports, 2019
- Cognitive–behavioral therapy for Internet gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysisClinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 2018
- Maladaptive Coping Styles in Adolescents with Internet Gaming Disorder SymptomsInternational Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2017
- Validation of the Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10) and evaluation of the nine DSM-5 Internet Gaming Disorder criteriaAddictive Behaviors, 2017
- Impulsive action and impulsive choice across substance and behavioral addictions: Cause or consequence?Addictive Behaviors, 2014
- Internet Gaming Disorder Treatment: A Review of Definitions of Diagnosis and Treatment OutcomeJournal of Clinical Psychology, 2014
- Index for rating diagnostic testsCancer, 1950