Chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI to assess cell death in breast cancer xenografts at 7T
Authors:
Open Access
- 31 July 2018
- journal article
- Published by Impact Journals, LLC in Oncotarget
- Vol. 9 (59) , 31490-31501
Abstract
// <![CDATA[ $('.header-date').hide();$('#titleAuthors').hide();$('#abstractHeader').hide(); // ]]> Jonathan Klein1, 2, 3, 4, Wilfred W. Lam1, Gregory J. Czarnota1, 2, 3, 4 and Greg J. Stanisz1, 2, 5 1Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 3Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 5Department of Neurosurgery and Pediatric Neurosurgery, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland Correspondence to: Greg J. Stanisz, email: stanisz@sri.utoronto.ca Keywords: CEST; MRI; breast cancer; cell death; response monitoring Received: March 14, 2018 Accepted: July 12, 2018 Published: July 31, 2018 ABSTRACT Purpose: Detecting cell death and predicting tumor response early in a course of chemotherapy could help optimize treatment regimens and improve clinical outcomes. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI was investigated in vivo to study properties that may be able to detect cancer death. Results: Using a magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) cutoff of 0.12 at 1.8 ppm was able to differentiate between viable tumor and cell death regions. Comparison of MTR values at this frequency showed significant differences (p < 0.0001) between viable tumor and cell death regions, matching patterns seen on histology. Using this cutoff, the mean increase in cell death index (± standard error of the mean) after chemotherapy was 4 ± 4%, 10% ± 7%, 10 ± 8%, and 4 ± 9% at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h, respectively. Conclusions: CEST MRI can detect cell death in MDA-231 xenografts but further work is needed to characterize the clinical applications of this finding. Maximum response to chemotherapy occurred at 8–12 h after chemotherapy injection in this in vivo tumor model. Materials and Methods: Breast cancer xenografts (MDA-MB-231) were scanned using 7 T MRI before and after chemotherapy. As a measure of CEST effect at 0.5 μT saturation amplitude, MTR values at frequency offsets of 1.8 and −3.3 ppm were evaluated. CEST signals after chemotherapy treatment were compared to cell-death histopathology of tumors.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Response Monitoring of Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Relevance of Breast Cancer SubtypeJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2011
- Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): What is in a name and what isn't?Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2011
- Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptidesNature Medicine, 2010
- Imaging of Brain Tumors: MR Spectroscopy and Metabolic ImagingNeuroimaging Clinics Of North America, 2010
- MR imaging of high-grade brain tumors using endogenous protein and peptide-based contrastNeuroImage, 2010
- Functional Imaging Using Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Women with Locally Advanced Breast CancerClinical Cancer Research, 2010
- Ultrasound Imaging of Apoptosis in Tumor Response: Novel Preclinical Monitoring of Photodynamic Therapy EffectsCancer Research, 2008
- Proton MR spectroscopy for monitoring early treatment response of breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapyAnnals of Oncology, 2008
- Preoperative Chemotherapy: Updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- MRI detection of glycogen in vivo by using chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging (glycoCEST)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007