Does the Porter hypothesis hold in China? Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot policy
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Applied Economics
- Vol. 24 (1) , 246-269
Abstract
Given the constraints of energy, environment, and climate change in the process of economic development, transitioning to a low-carbon economy by such means as the construction of low-carbon cities is a feasible approach to a sustainable development pattern that balances energy conservation, environmental protection, and economic growth. Utilizing the data of listed companies in China A-shares market over the period 2007–2016, we treat China’s low-carbon city pilot policy (LCCPP) as a quasi-natural experiment and adopt a difference-in-differences approach to explore the effect of LCCPP on the total factor productivity (TFP) of firms. Firm TFP is found to be negatively associated with the implementation of LCCPP. Our mechanism analysis reveals that the LCCPP stimulates innovation by firms in China, consistent with the weak Porter hypothesis. Moreover, the negative relationship between the LCCPP and TFP holds more strongly in larger firms or those located in the eastern region.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Environmental Regulation and Industrial Performance: Evidence from Unexpected Externalities in ChinaSSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
- Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon citiesHabitat International, 2012
- Low-Carbon Development Patterns: Observations of Typical Chinese CitiesEnergies, 2012
- On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exportsResearch Policy, 2012
- Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter HypothesisJournal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2011
- Trade, environmental regulations and industrial mobility: An industry-level study of JapanEcological Economics, 2010
- Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme: An empirical assessment for GermanyEnergy Policy, 2008
- Do environmental regulations hamper productivity growth? How accounting for improvements of plants' environmental performance can change the conclusionEcological Economics, 2007
- Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industriesResource and Energy Economics, 2006
- The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Census of ManufacturesJournal of Political Economy, 2002