Innovations in the use of mixed methods in real-world evaluation
- 3 July 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Development Effectiveness
- Vol. 7 (3) , 317-326
Abstract
This article illustrates a number of recent developments in mixed methods evaluation. These include how mixed methods can: strengthen the design of quantitative impact evaluations, help identify unintended outcomes of development programmes, contribute to the evaluation of complex development programmes and strengthen the focus of evaluations on equity and gender equality. Reference is made to some of Howard White's important contributions to these different areas of mixed methods. This article concludes with an assessment of the strengths and limitations of mixed methods when conducting evaluations under real-world budget, time, data and political constraints.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Introduction to Gender, Monitoring, Evaluation and LearningGender & Development, 2014
- Triangulation and Mixed Methods ResearchJournal of Mixed Methods Research, 2012
- Feminist Approaches to TriangulationJournal of Mixed Methods Research, 2012
- Achieving high-quality impact evaluation design through mixed methods: the case of infrastructureJournal of Development Effectiveness, 2011
- Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practiceJournal of Development Effectiveness, 2009
- Strengthening the evaluation of programme effectiveness through reconstructing baseline dataJournal of Development Effectiveness, 2009
- Working with Cases in Development Contexts: Some Insights from an Outlier2009
- Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has ComeEducational Researcher, 2004
- Theory-Based Evaluation: The Case of Social FundsAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 2004
- Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in Poverty AnalysisWorld Development, 2002