Toward toxicity testing of nanomaterials in the 21st century: a paradigm for moving forward
Author:
- 30 September 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
- Vol. 4 (1) , 1-15
Abstract
A challenge facing hazard identification and safety evaluation of engineered nanomaterials being introduced to market is the diversity and complexity of the types of materials with varying physicochemical properties, many of which can affect their toxicity by different mechanisms. In general, in vitro test systems have limited usefulness for hazard identification of nanoparticles due to various issues. Meanwhile, conducting chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity studies in rodents for every new nanomaterial introduced into the commerce is impractical if not impossible. New toxicity testing systems which rely on predictive, high‐throughput technologies may be the ultimate goal of evaluating the potential hazard of nanomaterials. However, at present, this approach alone is unlikely to succeed in evaluating the toxicity of the wide array of nanomaterials and requires validation from in vivo studies. This article proposes a paradigm for toxicity testing and elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of reference materials for specific nanomaterial classes/subclasses using short‐term in vivo animal studies in conjunction with high‐throughput screenings and mechanism‐based short‐term in vitro assays. The hazard potential of a particular nanomaterial can be evaluated by conducting only in vitro high‐throughput assays and mechanistic studies and comparing the data with those of the reference materials in the specific class/subclass—an approach in line with the vision for ‘Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century’ of chemicals. With well‐designed experiments, testing nanomaterials of varying/selected physicochemical parameters may be able to identify the physicochemical parameters contributing to toxicity. The data so derived could be used for the development of computer model systems to predict the hazard potential of specific nanoparticles based on property–activity relationships. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2012, 4:1–15. doi: 10.1002/wnan.162This article is categorized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Toxicology of NanomaterialsKeywords
This publication has 85 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Proteomics and Pulmonary Toxicity of Instilled Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes, Crocidolite Asbestos, and Ultrafine Carbon Black in MiceToxicological Sciences, 2010
- Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Induce Unique Inflammatory Footprints in the Lung: Important Implications for Nanoparticle TestingEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2010
- ToxCast on Target: In Vitro Assays and Computer Modeling Show Promise for Screening ChemicalsEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2010
- A 21st Century Paradigm for Evaluating the Health Hazards of Nanoscale Materials?Toxicological Sciences, 2009
- Genotoxicity of nano/microparticles in in vitro micronuclei, in vivo comet and mutation assay systemsParticle and Fibre Toxicology, 2009
- Raw Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes Induce Oxidative Stress and Activate MAPKs, AP-1, NF-κB, and Akt in Normal and Malignant Human Mesothelial CellsEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2008
- Perturbational profiling of nanomaterial biologic activityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Does nanoparticle activity depend upon size and crystal phase?Nanotoxicology, 2008
- In Search of the Most Relevant Parameter for Quantifying Lung Inflammatory Response to Nanoparticle Exposure: Particle Number, Surface Area, or What?Environmental Health Perspectives, 2007
- Cytotoxicity of Colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS NanoparticlesNano Letters, 2004