Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices
Open Access
- 16 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American Heart Association
- Vol. 10 (6) , e018127
Abstract
Background: The hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are uncharacterized. We aimed to quantify the hemodynamic effects of different ventricular pacing configurations in patients with LVADs, focusing on short‐term changes in load‐independent right ventricular (RV) contractility. Methods and Results: Patients with LVADs underwent right heart catheterization during spontaneous respiration without sedation and with pressures recorded at end expiration. Right heart catheterization was performed at different pacemaker configurations (biventricular pacing, left ventricular pacing, RV pacing, and unpaced conduction) in a randomly generated sequence with >3 minutes between configuration change and hemodynamic assessment. The right heart catheterization operator was blinded to the sequence. RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure was calculated from digitized hemodynamic waveforms, consistent with a previously validated protocol. Fifteen patients with LVADs who were in sinus rhythm were included. Load‐independent RV contractility, as assessed by RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure, was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (15.7±7.6 versus 11.0±4.0 s −1 ; P =0.003). Thermodilution cardiac output was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (4.48±0.7 versus 4.38±0.8 L/min; P =0.05). There were no significant differences in heart rate, ventricular filling pressures, or atrioventricular valvular regurgitation across all pacing configurations. Conclusions: Biventricular pacing acutely improves load‐independent RV contractility in patients with LVADs. Even in these patients with mechanical left ventricular unloading via LVAD who were relative pacing nonresponders (required LVAD support despite cardiac resynchronization therapy), biventricular pacing was acutely beneficial to RV contractility.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: Executive summaryThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2013
- 2012 EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: implant and follow-up recommendations and managementHeart Rhythm, 2012
- Reverse Remodeling With Left Ventricular Assist DevicesCirculation: Heart Failure, 2011
- Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy for Mild-to-Moderate Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) TrialCirculation, 2008
- Right Ventricular Function in Cardiovascular Disease, Part ICirculation, 2008
- The ventricular septum: the lion of right ventricular function, and its impact on right ventricular restoration☆European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2006
- Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy with or without an Implantable Defibrillator in Advanced Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The right ventricle: anatomy, physiology, and clinical importanceCurrent Problems in Cardiology, 1991