The corporate shaping of GM crops as a technology for the poor
Author:
- 22 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Peasant Studies
- Vol. 37 (1) , 67-90
Abstract
Genetically modified (GM, transgenic) crops are often invoked in debates about poverty, hunger, and agricultural development. The framing of GM crops as a ‘pro-poor’ and environmentally sustainable technology was partly a creation of the biotechnology industry, but cannot be explained as merely a cynical exercise in public relations. Storylines about poverty alleviation and sustainable development actually helped to drive and shape the technical and commercial strategies of the leading transnational agribusiness company, Monsanto, during the 1970s, 80s and 90s. However, while those storylines emerged alongside the GM crop technologies that were being developed in the company's laboratories and greenhouses, they failed to influence their design or technological content. Nevertheless, the pro-poor and sustainability rhetoric contributed directly to a transformation of Monsanto's sectoral and geographical scope, to include a new focus on markets in developing countries. In principle, serving farmers in these markets could lead the company to develop new products and technologies that are designed to address the needs of resource-poor smallholders, but the evidence of such a change occurring is scant.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trade and Biotechnology in Latin America: Democratization, Contestation and the Politics of MobilizationJournal of Agrarian Change, 2008
- Conservation tillage practice in sub-Saharan Africa: The experience of Sasakawa Global 2000Crop Protection, 2007
- Farmer Participation in Private Sector Agricultural ExtensionIDS Bulletin, 2005
- Introduction: is it possible to create pro‐poor agriculture‐related biotechnology?Journal of International Development, 2005
- Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry Opportunity Structures and the Efficacy of the Anti-Biotech Movement in Western EuropeSocial Problems, 2004
- Strategy: Where is the Pattern?Organization, 1996
- Metaphors and Mental Models: Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Innovative and Entrepreneurial ActivitiesJournal of Management, 1995
- Biotechnology: Feeding the World?Nature Biotechnology, 1992
- Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiationStrategic Management Journal, 1991
- Monsanto: Betting a Giant on BiotechnologyNature Biotechnology, 1986