Analysis of Endoscopy Intervention in Postesophagectomy Anastomotic Leak: A Retrospective Study
- 2 August 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
- Vol. 67 (07) , 597-602
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is one of the most challenging complications resulting in a high morbidity and mortality and prolonged hospitalization. The aim of this retrospective study was to access the impact of endoscopy intervention in anastomotic leak. Methods A retrospective review was conducted at our hospital from January 2008 to December 2016. In total, 263 patients who were diagnosed with an anastomotic leak after esophagectomy and underwent endoscopy examination were included in this study. First, all patients were divided into two groups based on a single criteria—whether they received endoscopy intervention or not—and comparisons were conducted between the two groups. Second, we categorized all patients into three groups based on the diameter of the anastomotic leak (group I: 15 mm). Detailed analyses were made for each group. Factors we considered included demographic factors, the length of postoperative hospital stay, the amount of medical expenditure, limited days of oral intake, and the incurrence of complications. Data relating to those factors were collected and then analyzed using standard statistic tools. Results In general, the difference between endoscopy intervention and conservative measure was significant. Moreover, the hospital stay (p < 0.001; p = 0.018), medical expenditure (p < 0.001; p = 0.003), limited days of oral intake (p < 0.001; p = 0.019), and postoperative complications such as hemorrhage (p < 0.001; p = 0.036), tracheoesophageal fistula (p = 0.002; p = 0.017), and anastomosis stricture (p = 0.03; p = 0.026) were significantly lower among patients who received endoscopy intervention in groups II and III. However, no significant difference was identified between endoscopy intervention and conservative measure in group I. Conclusions Endoscopy intervention is safe and effective in the diagnosis and treatment of postesophagectomy anastomotic leak. Especially for patients with a diameter of anastomotic leaks greater than 5 mm, the advantages of endoscopy intervention should not be neglected.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endoscopic repair of post-surgical gastrointestinal complicationsDigestive and Liver Disease, 2013
- Endoscopic stent insertion for anastomotic leakage following oesophagectomyThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2013
- Esophageal Stent Placement for the Treatment of Acute Intrathoracic Anastomotic Leak After EsophagectomyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2011
- Healing Occurs in Most Patients That Receive Endoscopic Stents for Anastomotic Leakage; Dislocation Remains a ProblemClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2011
- Systematic review of the benefits and risks of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for oesophageal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Treatment algorithm for postoperative upper gastrointestinal fistulas and leaks using combined Vicryl plug and fibrin glueEndoscopy, 2010
- Minimally invasive esophagectomyWorld Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010
- The management of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinomaDiseases of the Esophagus, 2009
- Surgical Factors Influence the Outcome After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Consecutive Series of 240 Patients at an Experienced CenterAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2009
- Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centreEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2005