Laboratory study of the loads, speeds and times to finish and polish direct restorative materials
Authors:
- 10 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
- Vol. 32 (9) , 686-692
Abstract
summary This study investigated the loads, speeds and times required to achieve the smoothest surface on samples of amalgam, composite resin and glass–ionomer cement using the four grades of a disc polishing system. The tests were conducted on a specially constructed jig. The restorations were abraded with the appropriate disc using a range of loads, speeds and times based on a previous practitioner study. The surface roughness of each material was measured before and after abrading. The load was varied first, followed by speed and finally time. Photomicrographs were taken of a sample finished at the optimum load, speed and time and of loads above and below the optimum that produced the smoothest surface finish. In addition the fractured edge of a sample finished at the optimum values was examined. There was an optimum load, speed and time that produced the smoothest surface for each restorative material. For amalgam and composite the surface roughness value decreased as the discs became finer. There was a reduction in the roughness value for glass–ionomer cement using the two roughest discs. The values obtained were substantially in contrast from the earlier practitioner study. There were specific values for load, speed and time that produced a smoother surface for each material.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The in vivo perception of roughness of restorationsBritish Dental Journal, 2004
- Synthesis of BISGMA derivatives, properties of their polymers and compositesJournal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 1997
- Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis of dental polymersII. Bis-phenol A-related resinsBiomaterials, 1989
- Finishing glass polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cementsBritish Dental Journal, 1988
- The hydration of a glass‐ionomer (ASPA) cementBritish Polymer Journal, 1981