Ethical aspects of the biologicalisation of manufacturing
Authors:
- Fiachra O’bRolcháinFiachra O’bRolcháin
- Bert GordijnBGBert Gordijn
- Gerry ByrneGBGerry Byrne
- Nicholas DunneNDNicholas Dunne
- 1 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology
- Vol. 34, 178-185
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Dublin City University
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The idea of weak sustainability is illegitimateEnvironment, Development and Sustainability, 2016
- Robots, law and the retribution gapEthics and Information Technology, 2016
- Biologically informed disciplines: a comparative analysis of bionics, biomimetics, biomimicry, and bio-inspiration among othersInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 2014
- Technology as Responsibility: Failure, Food Animals, and Lab-grown MeatJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2014
- Direct Brain Interventions and Responsibility EnhancementCriminal Law and Philosophy, 2012
- Self‐Sharpening Mechanism of the Sea Urchin ToothAdvanced Functional Materials, 2010
- A Core Precautionary Principle*Journal of Political Philosophy, 2006
- Sustainable development (1987–2005): an oxymoron comes of ageSustainable Development, 2005
- Who Owns Biodiversity, and How Should the Owners Be Compensated?Plant Physiology, 2004
- The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automataEthics and Information Technology, 2004