Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study
- 1 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
- Vol. 126 (3) , 414-420
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Universität Heidelberg
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intraoral Digital Impression Technique Compared to Conventional Impression Technique. A Randomized Clinical TrialJournal of Prosthodontics, 2015
- Effect of software version and parameter settings on the marginal and internal adaptation of crowns fabricated with the CAD/CAM systemJournal of Applied Oral Science, 2015
- Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preferenceThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2015
- Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trialClinical Oral Investigations, 2015
- Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: An assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptanceAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2014
- Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A ReviewJournal of Prosthodontics, 2014
- Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomesBMC Oral Health, 2014
- Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implantsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2013
- The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all‐ceramic crownsAustralian Dental Journal, 1995
- The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo techniqueBritish Dental Journal, 1971