Nickel hypersensitivity and endovascular devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective Nickel allergy is common; endovascular specialists are often confronted with nickel allergic patients ahead of the implantation of endovascular devices, many of which are nickel-containing. Our aim was to elucidate whether nickel hypersensitivity is significantly associated with worse or adverse outcomes after placement of a nickel-containing endovascular device. Methods Inclusion criteria were: endovascular and transcatheter procedures for coronary, structural heart, neurovascular and peripheral vascular pathology involving nickel-allergic patients. All adverse outcomes were included as defined by included studies. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken using a random-effects model. Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were conducted for articles published 1947–2019. Results 190 records were identified, 78 articles were included for qualitative synthesis and 15 met criteria for meta-analysis. Patch-test confirmed nickel allergy was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes following implantation of a nickel-containing endovascular device (n=14 articles, 1740 patients; OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.41 to 4.85). This finding further was observed in coronary (n=12 articles, 1624 patients; OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.23) and structural heart subgroups (n=2 articles, 83 patients; OR 52.28, 95% CI 1.31 to 2079.14), but not in the neurovascular subgroup (n=1 article, 33 patients; OR 3.04, 95% CI 0.59 to 15.72) or with a patient-reported history of nickel allergy (n=2 articles, 207 patients; OR 2.14, 95% CI 0.23 to 19.70). Conclusions Patch-tested nickel allergy is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes following endovascular device implantation and alternative treatment options should be considered. Specialists faced with patients’ self-reporting nickel allergy should consider proceeding to diagnostic patch-testing.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes After Coronary Stent Implantation in Patients With Metal AllergyCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2012
- Metal Allergy to Amplatzer Occluder Device Presented as Severe BronchospasmThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2009
- Metal Allergy—A Review on Exposures, Penetration, Genetics, Prevalence, and Clinical ImplicationsChemical Research in Toxicology, 2009
- A correlation found between gold concentration in blood and patch test reactions in patients with coronary stentsContact Dermatitis, 2008
- Nickel Allergy in Interatrial Shunt Device-based Closure PatientsCongenital Heart Disease, 2007
- High frequency of contact allergy to gold in patients with endovascular coronary stentsBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2007
- Adverse Events Associated With Nickel Allergy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect or Patent Foramen Ovale ClosureJACC, 2006
- The impact of metallic allergy on stent implantationInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Single‐Center Experience with the Helex™ Septal Occluder for Closure of Atrial Septal Defects in ChildrenJournal of Interventional Cardiology, 2003
- Metal‐induced generalized pruriginous dermatitis and endovascular surgeryContact Dermatitis, 2000