Pathway Analysis Interpretation in the Multi-Omic Era

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
In bioinformatics, pathway analyses are used to interpret biological data by mapping measured molecules with known pathways to discover their functional processes and relationships. Pathway analysis has become an essential tool for interpreting large-scale omics data, translating complex gene sets into actionable experimental insights. However, issues inherent to pathway databases and misinterpretations of pathway relevance often result in “pathway fails,” where findings, though statistically significant, lack biological applicability. For example, the Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) pathway was originally annotated based on its association with observed tumor necrosis, while it is multifunctional across diverse physiological processes in the body. This review broadly evaluates pathway analysis interpretation, including embedding-based, semantic similarity-based, and network-based approaches to clarify their ideal use-case scenarios. Each method for interpretation is assessed for its strengths, such as high-quality visualizations and ease of use, as well as its limitations, including data redundancy and database compatibility challenges. Despite advancements in the field, the principle of “garbage in, garbage out” (GIGO) shows that input quality and method choice are critical for reliable and biologically meaningful results. Methodological standardization, scalability improvements, and integration with diverse data sources remain areas for further development. By providing critical guidance with contextual examples such as TNF, we aim to help researchers align their objectives with the appropriate method. Advancing pathway analysis interpretation will further enhance the utility of pathway analysis, ultimately propelling progress in systems biology and personalized medicine.
Funding Information
  • National Institutes of Health (1T32GM144873-01, R01MH107487, R01MH121102, R01AG057598, R01AG083628)

This publication has 157 references indexed in Scilit: