Multiobjective Optimization and Comparison of Nonsingleton Type-1 and Singleton Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems
- 1 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
- Vol. 21 (3) , 459-476
Abstract
Singleton interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems (FLSs) have been widely applied in several real-world applications, where it was shown that the singleton interval type-2 FLSs outperform their singleton type-1 counterparts in applications with high uncertainty levels. However, one of the main criticisms of singleton interval type-2 FLSs is the fact that they outperform singleton type-1 FLSs solely based on their use of extra degrees of freedom (extra parameters) and that type-1 FLSs with a sufficiently large number of parameters may provide the same performance as interval type-2 FLSs. In addition, most works on type-2 FLSs only compare their results with singleton type-1 FLSs but fail to consider nonsingleton type-1 systems. In this paper, we aim to directly address and investigate this criticism. In order to do so, we will perform a comparative study between optimized singleton type-1, nonsingleton type-1, and singleton interval type-2 FLSs under the presence of noise. We will also present a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) for the optimization of singleton type-1, nonsingleton type-1, and singleton interval type-2 fuzzy systems for function approximation problems. The MOEA will aim to satisfy two objectives to maximize the accuracy of the FLS and minimize the number of rules in the FLS, thus improving its interpretability. Furthermore, we will present a methodology to obtain “optimal” consequents for the FLSs. Hence, this paper has two main contributions: First, it provides a common methodology to learn the three types of FLSs (i.e., singleton type-1, nonsingleton type-1, and singleton interval type-2 FLSs) from data samples. The second contribution is the creation of a common framework for the comparison of type-1 and type-2 FLSs that allows us to address the aforementioned criticism. We provide details of a series of experiments and include statistical analysis showing that the type-2 FLS is able to handle higher levels of noise than its nonsingleton and singleton type-1 counterparts.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimization of type-2 fuzzy systems based on bio-inspired methods: A concise reviewInformation Sciences, 2012
- Optimization of interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers using evolutionary algorithmsSoft Computing, 2010
- Uncertainty Modeling of Improved Fuzzy Functions With Evolutionary SystemsIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 2008
- A two-step rejection procedure for testing multiple hypothesesJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2008
- An adaptive neuro-fuzzy system for efficient implementationsInformation Sciences, 2007
- Hybrid learning models to get the interpretability–accuracy trade-off in fuzzy modelingSoft Computing, 2005
- Dynamical Optimal Training for Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Neural Network (T2FNN)IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 2004
- Computing Derivatives in Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic SystemsIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2004
- Learning and adaptation of an intelligent mobile robot navigator operating in unstructured environment based on a novel online Fuzzy–Genetic systemFuzzy Sets and Systems, 2004
- Designing fuzzy inference systems from data: An interpretability-oriented reviewIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2001