Long‐Term Performance of Transvenous, Steroid‐Eluting, High Impedance, Passive‐Fixation Ventricular Pacing Leads
Authors:
- 29 October 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 27 (10) , 1399-1404
Abstract
The long-term performance of two high impedance, steroid-eluting, passive-fixation ventricular leads, porous platinum iridium electrode CPI Selute Picotip 4035 (131 patients), and platinized platinum electrode Medtronic Capsure Z 5034 (57 patients), was compared with one conventional 8.0-mm2 porous platinum iridium electrode CPI Selute 4285 (38 patients). The mean follow-up period was 28 +/- 14 months. Capture threshold, R wave amplitude, and pacing impedance were measured at the time of implantation, immediately after implantation, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation and then every 6 months thereafter. The two high impedance leads revealed a higher sensing slew rate than the conventional lead, the R wave amplitude was similar among the three groups, but the voltage threshold at 0.5-ms pulse width was significantly higher in porous platinum iridium groups at the time of implantation. During follow-up, the conventional lead revealed a significantly higher R wave amplitude within the first 3 months, however, this pattern disappeared after 3 months. Pacing impedance was significantly higher in the high impedance porous platinum iridium electrode groups. Voltage threshold at 0.5-ms pulse width was similar among the three groups in the first 3 months, however, it increased gradually and was significantly higher in porous platinum iridium electrode groups subsequently. The energy threshold at 0.5 ms was significantly lower in the two high impedance groups than the conventional group, but no difference was found in the two high impedance groups. Lead related complications were similar among the three groups. In conclusion, high impedance electrodes with different design and materials had different properties; platinized platinum electrode showed a lower pacing impedance but had a more stable long-term capture threshold as compared to the porous platinum iridium electrode. Further studies are mandatory for the development of an ideal pacing lead.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Worldwide evaluation of a defibrillation lead with a small geometric electrode surface for high-impedance pacingAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- The Influence of High Versus Normal Impedance Ventricular Leads on Pacemaker Generator LongevityPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2003
- Microdislodgment:Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2003
- 1‐Year Performance of a Defibrillation Lead with a Small Electrode Surface for High Impedance Pacing: A Randomized, Controlled StudyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2002
- Steroid Eluting High Impedance Pacing Leads Decrease Short and Long‐Term Current Drain: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Trial.Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1999
- Clinical Performance of Steroid‐Eluting Pacing Leads with 1.2‐mm2 ElectrodesPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1997
- The Steroid‐Eluting Electrode: A 10‐Year ExperiencePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1996
- A New Efficient NanoTip LeadPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- A New Low Threshold Platinized Epicardial Pacing Electrode: Comparative Evaluation in Immature CaninesPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Decreasing electrode size and increasing efficiency of cardiac stimulationJournal of Surgical Research, 1971