Cardiac remodelling and functional status after cardiac resynchronization therapy: comparison between de-novo implantation and upgrade from right ventricular pacing
Open Access
- 26 June 2026
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in ESC Heart Failure
- Vol. 13 (4)
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with heart failure induced by chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing commonly undergo upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to compare the effect size of improvement in cardiac function and functional capacity between patients with RV pacing and intrinsic conduction at baseline. Methods: We included patients from the ImagingCRT, ElectroCRT and DANISH-CRT trials aged ≥40 years with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% and prolonged QRS. The primary endpoint was change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints included change in QRS duration, echocardiographic measures (LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular mass index, and left atrial volume index), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, six-minute walk test, quality of life, New York Heart Association functional class and loop diuretic use. Results: We included 592 patients [mean age 70.7 ± 9 years; 24.8% women; mean LVEF 27 ± 6%; 97 (16.4%) with RV pacing and 495 (83.6%) with intrinsic conduction at baseline]. We found significant relative reduction in LVESV in patients with RV pacing (−34 ± 25%) and intrinsic conduction (−32 ± 26%) with no difference between the groups [mean difference −2%, 95% CI (−8; 4), P = .469]. Absolute LVEF improvement was 14 ± 9% and 13 ± 10%, respectively. Reduction in QRS duration was larger with RV pacing compared with intrinsic conduction (−38 ± 26 vs −26 ± 24 ms). We found significant improvements in the remaining secondary endpoints, with no difference between the groups. Conclusion: Patients with RV paced QRS morphology who are upgraded to CRT derive substantial improvement in cardiac function and functional capacity, comparable to patients with intrinsic conduction undergoing CRT.Keywords
Funding Information
- Danish Cardiovascular Academy (PhD2021011-HF)
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF20SA0067242)
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF16OC0018658)
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF17OC0029148)
- Hjerteforeningen
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Outcome After Upgrade to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Propensity Score-Matched AnalysisEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2023
- Cardiac computed tomography-verified right ventricular lead position and outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapyJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2022
- Septal versus apical pacing sites in permanent right ventricular pacing: The multicentre prospective SEPTAL-PM studyArchives of Cardiovascular Diseases, 2022
- Upgrades from a Previous Device Compared to De Novo Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in the European Society of Cardiology CRT Survey IIEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2018
- Left atrial size and function as assessed by computed tomography in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Association to echocardiographic and clinical outcomeThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2017
- Multimodality Imaging-Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Randomized Controlled TrialEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2016
- Different Regions of Latest Electrical Activation During Left Bundle-Branch Block and Right Ventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients Determined by Coronary Venous Electro-Anatomic MappingEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2014
- Echocardiographic and Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients with and without Previous Right Ventricular PacingEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2014
- Dual-Chamber Pacing or Ventricular Backup Pacing in Patients With an Implantable DefibrillatorJAMA, 2002
- Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: Reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendanAmerican Heart Journal, 1992