Pricing Strategies in Dual-Channel Reverse Supply Chains Considering Fairness Concern
Open Access
- 13 May 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 16 (9) , 1657
Abstract
The fierce competition in the recycling industry and the rapid development of internet technology has prompted recycling centers to develop a dual-channel reverse supply chain with both offline and online recycling channels. After the introduction of online channels, recycling centers and third-party recyclers (TPR) have paid attention to the division of profits in supply chain systems and the behavior of fairness concerns. Therefore, it is necessary to help recycling enterprises make pricing decisions in consideration of fairness concerns. This paper is aimed at answering the following two main questions: (1) When the recycling center or TPR have fairness concerns, how does the optimal pricing and revenue of supply chain members change when both sides are neutral? (2) When the fairness concern coefficient changes, how does the overall revenue of the supply chain system change? How should supply chain members adjust their pricing decisions to maximize their own profits? In order to solve the above problems, Stackelberg game models were made from three aspects: both sides are neutral, only the TPR has fairness concerns, and only the recycling center has fairness concerns. Based on the results of the example analyses for the model, we found that when only the TPR has fairness concerns, the profit of the recycling center and the transfer price of offline channels will decrease, while the profit of TPR is the opposite. Furthermore, when only a recycling center has fairness concerns, it will lead to the reduction of not only the recycling price and transfer price of offline channels, but also the profits of the entire supply chain system. Specially, whether it is for a recycling center or TPR, a lower level of fairness concern coefficient has a stronger impact on pricing and revenue than at high levels.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71401133)
- National Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2015JQ7280)
- Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province of China (2018S44)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distributional and Peer‐Induced Fairness in Supply Chain Contract DesignProduction and Operations Management, 2013
- Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory studyJournal of Operations Management, 2013
- How does justice matter in achieving buyer–supplier relationship performance?Journal of Operations Management, 2012
- Channel coordination under fairness concerns and nonlinear demandEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2010
- Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countriesResources, Conservation and Recycling, 2008
- Sunk costs and fairness in incomplete information bargainingGames and Economic Behavior, 2005
- Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for "Asymmetric Paternalism"University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2003
- ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and CompetitionAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- Fairness as a constraint on trust in reciprocity: earned property rights in a reciprocal exchange experimentEconomics Letters, 2000
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskEconometrica, 1979