Complications with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and recent evolutions
- 3 March 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Orthopaedics
- Vol. 37 (5) , 843-851
Abstract
Since its description by Paul Grammont from Dijon, France, several tens of thousands of reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSA) have been performed for diverse conditions. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the complications of this procedure in the literature and in clinical practice. A total of 240 papers concerning RTSA published between 1996 and 2012 have been identified. Over 80 papers describe complications associated with this type of implant. A list of prostheses satisfying European and US standards, CE and FDA approved, has been produced on the basis of information provided by the manufacturers. Data from the literature do not support a meta-analysis. The inventory of best practices shows excellent results in the short and medium term in specific indications, while the number of complications varies between 10 and 65 % in long-term series. Complications can be classified into (A) non-specific including infections (superficial and deep), phlebitis, haematoma, neurological complications of the suprascapular, radial and axillary nerves and (B) specific complications associated with RTSA including (1) on the glenoid side: intraoperative fracture of the glenoid and acromion, late fracture of the scapula, impingement at the scapular neck (notching), glenoid loosening, dissociation of the glenoid component (snatching of the glenosphere) and fractures of the glenoid baseplate; (2) on the humeral side: metaphyseal deterioration, humeral loosening, instability of the shoulder, stiffness with limitation of external and/or internal rotation; and (3) muscular complications with fatty degeneration of the deltoid. Additionally we have identified specific situations related to the type of implant such as the disassembly of the humeral or the glenoid component, dissociation of the polyethylene humeral plate, dissociation of the metaphysis and osteolysis of the tuberosities. The integration of results from different clinical series is difficult because of the lack of a database and the multitude of implants used.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty be Used with Few Complications in Rheumatoid Arthritis?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Scapula Fractures After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Classification and TreatmentClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- A Complication-based Learning Curve From 200 Reverse Shoulder ArthroplastiesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty—from the most to the least common complicationInternational Orthopaedics, 2010
- Effect of posterior offset humeral components on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplastyInternational Orthopaedics, 2010
- Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for failed conventional shoulder replacement due to cuff failure—midterm resultsInternational Orthopaedics, 2010
- Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement: Intraoperative and Early Postoperative ComplicationsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
- Proprioception in total, hemi- and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 3D motion analyses: a prospective studyInternational Orthopaedics, 2008
- Glenosphere DisengagementClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008
- Glenoid Reconstruction in Revision Shoulder ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008