The impact of the introduction of drug-eluting stents on the clinical practice of surgical and percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease
Open Access
- 6 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 26 (7) , 675-681
Abstract
Aims Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have recently been shown to reduce restenosis in selected patients. The impact of this new stent on the use of coronary bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinical practice is yet unknown. Therefore, we investigated the impact of SES on the clinical practice of CABG and PCI in a series of unselected consecutive patients. Methods and results Between April and October 2002, a policy of SES implantation for all procedures has been instituted in our hospital. In total, 798 patients were referred to PCI and 275 to CABG (SES group). A control group was composed of all interventions (806 PCI and 314 CABG) performed during the preceding 6 months (pre-SES). The main outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 15 months. In the SES era, a significant shift was noted in the PCI group towards more multi-vessel stenting (28 vs. 24%; PPPP=0.02). Furthermore, we observed a shift in the CABG group towards more impaired LV function (pre-SES: 34% vs. SES: 41%; P=0.02) and towards more three-vessel disease (pre-SES: 67% vs. SES: 75%; P=0.03). Overall, the cumulative MACE percentages at 1 year after coronary revascularization (PCI and CABG combined) decreased from 16.8 to 13.8% (P=0.03). The cumulative MACE percentages in the pure SES group and the pre-SES bare metal stent group at 12 months were 15.6 and 19.8%, respectively (PConclusion The introduction of the SES has certainly had an impact on the treatment strategy of coronary artery disease (CAD). Increased use of these stents allows more complex coronary anatomy to be treated by PCI, and results in lower repeat revascularization rates.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical outcomes for sirolimus‐eluting stent implantation and vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of in‐stent restenosisCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2004
- Unrestricted Utilization of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the “Real World”Circulation, 2004
- Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis in a Native Coronary ArteryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Early outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromesJACC, 2003
- A Randomized Comparison of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent with a Standard Stent for Coronary RevascularizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Sustained Suppression of Neointimal Proliferation by Sirolimus-Eluting StentsCirculation, 2001
- Immediate and one-year outcome in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions in the modern era (NHLBI dynamic registry)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
- Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- A comparison of three-year survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyJACC, 1999
- Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery diseaseThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996