Assessment of the Validity and Quality of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) Screening Tools Available for Women Globally: A Systematic Review
Authors:
- Lea SaccaLea Sacca
- Diana LobainaDiana Lobaina
- Elisheva KnopfElisheva Knopf
- Sara BurgoaSara Burgoa
- Samantha JimenezSamantha Jimenez
- Goodness OkwarajiGoodness Okwaraji
- Madison EtzelMadison Etzel
- Vartiter VardanyanVartiter Vardanyan
- Madison TharpMadison Tharp
- Meera RaoMeera Rao
- Vama JhumkhawalaVama Jhumkhawala
- Joshua SohmerJoshua Sohmer
Open Access
- 23 August 2024
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Clinics and Practice
- Vol. 14 (5) , 1625-1649
Abstract
Background: This systematic review has the following aims: (1) to identify measurement tools used globally by healthcare providers to diagnose PCOS in women at elevated risk; (2) to assess the comprehensiveness of these tools regarding mental health and chronic pain; (3) to list strategies for validating, disseminating, and implementing these tools; and (4) to provide future recommendations for experts in healthcare settings. Methods: This review utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the Arksey and O’Malley York methodology. Studies were sourced from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, with inclusion criteria focusing on peer-reviewed articles addressing PCOS diagnosis and associated comorbidities. Data extraction and analysis followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations. Results: A total of 63 studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that current screening tools for PCOS often lack comprehensive integration of mental health and chronic pain assessments. Tools like the PCOSQ and its updated version, PCOSQ-50, inadequately address pain-related symptoms, highlighting a gap in holistic patient evaluation. This review identified significant associations between PCOS and mental health disorders, including anxiety and depression, emphasizing the need for mental health screenings as part of PCOS management. Conclusions: There is a critical need for validated PCOS screening tools that encompass both physical and psychological aspects of the condition. Educating healthcare providers on the cultural and social determinants influencing PCOS can improve diagnosis and patient outcomes. Future research should focus on developing holistic screening tools and culturally relevant educational resources, aiming to enhance the overall quality of life for women with PCOS.Keywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- A population-based follow-up study shows high psychosis risk in women with PCOSArchives of Women's Mental Health, 2021
- How Common are Depressive-Anxiety States, Body Image Concerns and Low Self-Esteem in Patients of PCOS?The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2021
- Polycystic ovary syndrome with feasible equivalence to overweight as a risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease development and severity in Mexican populationAnnals of Hepatology, 2020
- Influence of polycystic ovary syndrome on the periodontal health of Indian women visiting a secondary health care centreClinical Oral Investigations, 2018
- Psychiatric disorders in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysisEndocrine, 2018
- Health-related quality of life in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: validation of the German PCOSQ-GArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2017
- Mental health status assessment in polycystic ovarian syndrome infertility patients: A pilot studyCurrent Medical Science, 2017
- Polycystic ovary syndrome: early diagnosis and intervention are necessary for fertility preservation in young women with endometrial cancer under 35 years of ageReproductive Medicine and Biology, 2016
- Health-related quality of life questionnaire for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOSQ-50): development and psychometric propertiesQuality of Life Research, 2016
- Clinical characteristics, metabolic features, and phenotype of Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a large-scale case–control studyArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012