Genomic testing in cancer: Patient knowledge, attitudes, and expectations
Open Access
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genomic testing in cancer (GTC) characterizes genes that play an important role in the development and growth of a patient's cancer. This form of DNA testing is currently being studied for its ability to guide cancer therapy. The objective of the current study was to describe patients' knowledge, attitudes, and expectations toward GTC.METHODS: A 42‐item self‐administered GTC questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary group and patient pretesting. The questionnaire was distributed to patients with advanced cancer who were referred to the Princess Margaret Cancer Center for a phase 1 clinical trial or GTC testing.RESULTS: Results were reported from 98 patients with advanced cancer, representing 66% of the patients surveyed. Seventy‐six percent of patients were interested in learning more about GTC, and 64% reported that GTC would significantly improve their cancer care. The median score on a 12‐item questionnaire to assess knowledge of cancer genomics was 8 of 12 items correct (67%; interquartile range, 7‐9 of 12 items correct [58%‐75%]). Scores were associated significantly with patients' education level (P < .0001). Sixty‐six percent of patients would consent to a needle biopsy, and 39% would consent to an invasive surgical biopsy if required for GTC. Only 48% of patients reported having sufficient knowledge to make an informed decision to pursue GTC whereas 34% of patients indicated a need for formal genetic counseling.CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced cancer are motivated to participate in GTC. Patients require further education to understand the difference between somatic and germline mutations in the context of GTC. Educational programs are needed to support patients interested in pursuing GTC. Cancer 2014;120:3066–3073. © 2014 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multi-Purpose Utility of Circulating Plasma DNA Testing in Patients with Advanced CancersPLOS ONE, 2012
- Attitudes of Patients With Cancer About Personalized Medicine and Somatic Genetic TestingJournal of Oncology Practice, 2012
- The Genetic Basis for Cancer Treatment DecisionsCell, 2012
- Clinical Implications of the Cancer GenomeJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Is Deidentification Sufficient to Protect Health Privacy in Research?The American Journal of Bioethics, 2010
- Attitude towards genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a comparison of affected and unaffected womenEuropean Journal of Cancer Care, 2010
- Genome-Wide Massively Parallel Sequencing of Formaldehyde Fixed-Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) Tumor Tissues for Copy-Number- and Mutation-AnalysisPLOS ONE, 2009
- Ethics and biobanksBritish Journal of Cancer, 2008
- Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencingNature Reviews Genetics, 2008
- Impact of an information booklet on satisfaction and decision-making about BRCA genetic testingEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2006