This Isn’t CSI
Authors:
- Travis C. PrattTPTravis C. Pratt
- Michael J. GaffneyMGMichael J. Gaffney
- Nicholas P. LovrichNLNicholas P. Lovrich
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Criminal Justice Policy Review
- Vol. 17 (1) , 32-47
Abstract
The increasing application of forensic DNA analysis in the criminal justice system has led to considerable public debate. Such discussions typically center on either its use for identifying criminal offenders (and for exonerating those who have been wrongfully convicted) or legal questions concerning the proper scope of DNA evidence collection. Currently missing from these debates is an accurate estimate of the national backlog of cases that might benefit from the application of forensic DNA analysis. The authors estimate this backlog using data gathered from a nationally representative sample of local law enforcement agencies and from the total population of both state and local crime laboratories. The authors document the primary barriers identified by these agencies to the expanded use of forensic DNA analysis in the processing of criminal cases. The authors conclude with a discussion of the implications for the continued support of and increased access to forensic DNA testing by law enforcement agencies.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Crime and Politics2001
- The Consequences of Defending DNA Statistics2000
- Interpreting DNA Evidence: Can Probability Theory Help?2000
- Statistics, Litigation, and Conduct Unbecoming2000
- Density and age-specific mortalityGenetica, 1995
- Genetic differences at four DNA typing loci in Finnish, Italian, and mixed Caucasian populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1992
- Population Genetics in Forensic DNA TypingScience, 1991
- DNA fingerprinting on trialNature, 1989
- Introduction to Survey Sampling1983