The Interaction of the High‐Density Lipoprotein with Cultured Cells of Bovine Vascular Endothelium
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 October 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Biochemistry
- Vol. 119 (2) , 317-325
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) is mitogenic for low‐density vascular endo thelial cell cultures. In contrast, low‐density lipoprotein(LDL) at physiological concentration is cytotoxic for this cell type [Tauber et al. (1980) J.Clin.Invest. 66, 696‐709]. In order to relate these observations to the physico‐chemical events occurring after the interaction of these lipoproteins with the cells, we have studied the binding, internalization, and degradation of HDL as a function of cell density and organization and have compared the results to those obtained with LDL.Cultured vascular endothelial cells bind HDL to an extent which, on a molar basis, is similar to that of LDL. Since an 80% loss of the LDL receptor sites in cells that were preexposed to LDL was not associated with a detectable decrease in HDL binding, it is likely that HDL and LDL binding sites exist on the cell surface as distinct entities A 5‐10 fold molar excess of LDL over 125 I‐HDL was almost as effective as a similar excess of unlabeled HDL in reducing the binding of 125, indicationg that LDL can comete with HDL for HDL binding sites. In contrast, 125 I‐LDL binding and uptake were reduced by less than 20% in the presence of a 50‐fold molar excess of unlabeled HDL. Both uptake and degradation of HDL were 10‐20 fold lower than those of LDL. HDL degradation was only slightly or not inhibited by chloroquine at a concentration which almost fully inhibited the degradation of LDL. Confluent and highly orgainized endothelial cell cultures bind HDL and LDL particles to an extent which is half of the amount bound to sparse or subconfluent culture However. The formation of a resting endothelial cell monlayer was associated with only a twofold decrease in the uptake of HDL, as compard to a 10‐20‐fold decrease in the uptake and degradation of LDL. In both sparse and confluent endothelial cultures, uptake via fluid pinocytosis non‐specific adscorptive endocytosis could account for most of the HDL uptake. The different pathways of internalization of HDL when added at high concentration to sparse and actively growing cultures.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Animal Cell CycleAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 1978
- Interaction between High Density and Low Density Lipoproteins during Uptake and Degradation by Cultured Human FibroblastsJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1977
- Control of proliferation of bovine vascular endothelial cellsJournal of Cellular Physiology, 1977
- EndocytosisAnnual Review of Biochemistry, 1977
- Membrane flow during pinocytosis. A stereologic analysis.Journal of Cell Biology, 1976
- Release of low density lipoprotein from its cell surface receptor by sulfated glycosaminoglycansCell, 1976
- Efficient Trace-labelling of Proteins with IodineNature, 1958
- Diffusion-in-Gel Methods for Immunological Analysis1958
- The Molecular Weights and Dimensions of Some Human Serum LipoproteinsJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1956
- THE DISTRIBUTION AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF ULTRACENTRIFUGALLY SEPARATED LIPOPROTEINS IN HUMAN SERUMJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1955