Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Straumann® BoneCeramic™ and Bio‐Oss® in a Split Mouth Design and Later Placement of Implants: A 5‐Year Report from a Longitudinal Study
Authors:
- 10 September 2015
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
- Vol. 18 (5) , 926-936
Abstract
Background: Straumann® BoneCeramic™ is a synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) aimed for sinus floor augmentation. Long‐term follow‐up of implants placed in BCP after sinus augmentation is still missing.Purpose: The primary aim of the study was to compare survival rates and marginal bone loss of Straumann SLActive implants placed in either BCP (test) or Bio‐Oss® (DBB) (control) after sinus floor augmentation. The secondary aim was to calculate graft sinus height at different time points.Materials and Methods: Bilateral sinus floor augmentation was performed in a split mouth model. Eleven patients (mean age 67 years) received 100% BCP on one side and 100% DBB on the contralateral side. After 8 months of graft healing, 62 Straumann SLActive implants were placed. After 5 years of functional loading (6 years after augmentation) of implants, marginal bone levels and grafted sinus height were measured, and implant survival and success rates were calculated.Results: After 5 years of loading, all prosthetic constructions were in function although two implants were lost in each grafting material. The overall implant survival rate was 93.5% (91.7% for BCP, 91.3% for DBB, and 100% for residual bone). The success rates were 83.3% and 91.3% for BCP and DBB, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in mean marginal bone level after 5 years between BCP (1.4 ± 1.2 mm) and DBB (1.0 ± 0.7 mm). Graft height reduction (GHR) after 6 years was limited to 6.6% for BCP and 5.8% for DBB.Conclusion: In this limited RCT study, the choice of biomaterial used for sinus floor augmentation did not seem to have any impact on survival rates and marginal bone level of the placed implants after 5 years of functional loading and GHR was minimal.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Marginal Bone Loss in Implants Placed in Grafted Maxillary SinusClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2013
- Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humansClinical Oral Implants Research, 2011
- Survival Rate for Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla With and Without Sinus Augmentation: A Comparative Cohort StudyJournal of Periodontology, 2011
- Histological and histomorphometrical analyses of biopsies harvested 11 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine and autogenous boneClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010
- A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materialsHead & Face Medicine, 2009
- Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio‐Oss® or Straumann® Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trialClinical Oral Implants Research, 2008
- Bone substitutes and growth factors as an alternative/complement to autogenous bone for grafting in implant dentistryPeriodontology 2000, 2008
- Patient self‐evaluation of intra‐oral bone grafting treatment to the maxillary frontal regionDental Traumatology, 2008
- Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and β‐tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2006
- Implant Biomechanics in Grafted Sinus: A Finite Element AnalysisJournal of Oral Implantology, 2004