Mammographic features and screening outcome in a randomized controlled trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography

This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:

• Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis
  European Radiology, 2020
• Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis or Mammography: A Meta-analysis of Cancer Detection and Recall
  JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018
• Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial
  Radiology, 2018
• Prospective study aiming to compare 2D mammography and tomosynthesis + synthesized mammography in terms of cancer detection and recall. From double reading of 2D mammography to single reading of tomosynthesis
  European Radiology, 2018
• Benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to digital mammography for breast cancer screening focused on cancer characteristics: a meta-analysis
  Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017
• Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study
  The Lancet Oncology, 2016
• Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study
  European Radiology, 2015
• Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images
  Radiology, 2014
• Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration
  European Radiology, 2013
• Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2005