To cross or not to cross? Review and meta-analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance decisions at midblock street crossings
Authors:
- Athanasios TheofilatosATAthanasios Theofilatos
- Apostolos ZiakopoulosAZApostolos Ziakopoulos
- Oscar Oviedo-TrespalaciosOOOscar Oviedo-Trespalacios
- Andrew TimmisATAndrew Timmis
- 1 September 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Transport & Health
- Vol. 22
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Australian Research Council (DE200101079)
This publication has 81 references indexed in Scilit:
- Walking when intoxicated: An investigation of the factors which influence individuals’ drink walking intentionsSafety Science, 2012
- Effects of Mobile Phone Use on Accident RiskTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011
- Publication Bias in Road Safety Evaluation: How can It be Detected and how Common is It?Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010
- A critical assessment of pedestrian behaviour modelsTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2009
- Survival analysis: Pedestrian risk exposure at signalized intersectionsTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2007
- Why People Cross Where They Do: The Role of Street EnvironmentTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004
- Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: an examination based on observation and survey dataTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2003
- Measuring Pedestrian Quality of Service for Midblock Street Crossings: Selection of Potential DeterminantsTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003
- Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001
- Pedestrian travel experiencesJournal of Transport Geography, 1996