Infection control in the home: a qualitative study exploring perceptions and experiences of adhering to protective behaviours in the home during the COVID-19 pandemic
Open Access
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to explore people’s experiences and perceptions of implementing infection control behaviours in the home during the COVID-19 pandemic, guided by an online behavioural intervention. Design: Inductive qualitative study. Setting: UK public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants: Thirteen people took part in telephone interviews, and 124 completed a qualitative open-text survey. All were recruited from the public. Most survey participants were aged over 60 years, while interview participants were more distributed in age. Most reported being at increased risk from COVID-19, and were white British. Intervention: Online behavioural intervention to support infection control behaviours in the home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data collection: Telephone think-aloud interviews and qualitative survey data. Data analysis: The think-aloud interview data and qualitative survey data were analysed independently using inductive thematic analysis. The findings were subsequently triangulated. Results: Thematic analysis of the telephone interviews generated seven themes : perceived risk; belief in the effectiveness of protective behaviours; acceptability of distancing and isolation; having capacity to perform the behaviours; habit forming reduces effort; having the confidence to perform the behaviours; and social norms affect motivation to engage in the behaviours . The themes identified from the survey data mapped well onto the interview analysis. Isolating and social distancing at home were less acceptable than cleaning and handwashing, influenced by the need for intimacy with household members. This was especially true in the absence of symptoms and when perceived risk was low. People felt more empowered when they understood that even small changes, such as spending some time apart, were worthwhile to reduce exposure and lessen viral load. Conclusions: The current study provided valuable insight into the acceptability and feasibility of protective behaviours, and how public health guidance could be incorporated into a behaviour change intervention for the public during a pandemic.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- NIHR (CL-2016-26-005)
- UKRI (CV220-009)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conducting qualitative interviews by telephone: Lessons learned from a study of alcohol use among sexual minority and heterosexual womenQualitative Social Work, 2015
- The Person-Based Approach to Intervention Development: Application to Digital Health-Related Behavior Change InterventionsJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2015
- Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A reviewBritish Journal of Health Psychology, 2010
- Using Mixed Methods to Design a Web-based Behavioural Intervention to Reduce Transmission of Colds and FluJournal of Health Psychology, 2010
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Reflecting on the think‐aloud method for evaluating e‐learningBritish Journal of Educational Technology, 2005
- The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of BehaviorPsychological Inquiry, 2000
- The theory of planned behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991
- Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987
- Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987