Effectiveness of integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens in HIV-infected treatment-naive individuals: results from a European multi-cohort study
Open Access
- 2 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Vol. 76 (9) , 2394-2399
Abstract
INSTIs have become a pillar of first-line ART. Real-world data are needed to assess their effectiveness in routine care. We analysed ART-naive patients who started INSTI-based regimens in 2012–19 whose data were collected by INTEGRATE, a European collaborative study including seven national cohorts. Kaplan–Meier analyses assessed time to virological failure (VF), defined as one viral load (VL) ≥1000 copies/mL, two consecutive VLs ≥50 copies/mL, or one VL ≥50 copies/mL followed by treatment change after ≥24 weeks of follow-up, and time to INSTIs discontinuation (INSTI-DC) for any reason. Factors associated with VF and INSTI-DC were explored by logistic regression analysis. Of 2976 regimens started, 1901 (63.9%) contained dolutegravir, 631 (21.2%) elvitegravir and 444 (14.9%) raltegravir. The 1 year estimated probabilities of VF and INSTI-DC were 5.6% (95% CI 4.5–6.7) and 16.2% (95% CI 14.9–17.6), respectively, and were higher for raltegravir versus both elvitegravir and dolutegravir. A baseline VL ≥100 000 copies/mL [adjusted HR (aHR) 2.17, 95% CI 1.55–3.04, P < 0.001] increased the risk of VF, while a pre-treatment CD4 count ≥200 cells/mm3 reduced the risk (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.37–0.74, P < 0.001). Predictors of INSTI-DC included use of raltegravir versus dolutegravir (aHR 3.03, 95% CI 2.34–3.92, P < 0.001), use of >3 drugs versus 3 drugs (aHR 2.73, 95% CI 1.55–4.79, P < 0.001) and starting ART following availability of dolutegravir (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48–0.83, P = 0.001). Major INSTI mutations indicative of transmitted drug resistance occurred in 2/1114 (0.2%) individuals. This large multi-cohort study indicates high effectiveness of elvitegravir- or dolutegravir-based first-line ART in routine practice across Europe.Keywords
Funding Information
- INTEGRATE
- Swedish Research Council (2016–01675)
- European Union by the CARE H2020 (825673)
- Stockholm County Council (ALF (20190451)
- CIMED (20200645)
- Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (PTDC/SAU-INF/31990/20170, GHTM-UID/Multi/04413/2013)
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of HIV-1 integrase resistance emergence and evolution in patients treated with integrase inhibitorsJournal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 2020
- Meta-analysis and systematic review of the efficacy and resistance for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase strand transfer inhibitorsInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2019
- Adverse drug reactions to integrase strand transfer inhibitorsAIDS, 2018
- Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380–1490): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority trialThe Lancet, 2017
- Tolerability of integrase inhibitors in a real-life settingJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2017
- Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy in Early Asymptomatic HIV InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- A Trial of Early Antiretrovirals and Isoniazid Preventive Therapy in AfricaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Prevention of HIV-1 Infection with Early Antiretroviral TherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Effect of Early versus Deferred Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV on SurvivalNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Web Resources for HIV Type 1 Genotypic-Resistance Test InterpretationClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006