The ‘Catch 22’ of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study
Authors:
- 19 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Marketing Communications
- Vol. 14 (2) , 97-111
Abstract
This research explored the apparent ‘Catch 22’ of communicating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Although companies are regularly encouraged to engage in CSR, they are simultaneously discouraged to communicate about this engagement. We contribute with two models that may help to explain how companies can best communicate about their CSR initiatives. Based on a reputation survey and two case studies of Danish corporate CSR frontrunners, first we develop an ‘inside‐out approach’ to suggest how managers can manage their CSR activities to achieve favourable CSR reputation in a ‘Catch 22’ context. Employees appear as a key component in building trustworthiness as CSR communication is shown to evolve when taking an ‘inside‐out approach’. Second, we develop a CSR communication model with two CSR communication processes targeting different stakeholder groups: ‘the expert CSR communication process’ and ‘the endorsed CSR communication process’. Integrating these models and processes may help companies strategically capture reputational advantage from their CSR initiatives.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategiesBusiness Ethics: A European Review, 2006
- Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible ProgramsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2006
- A Reputation Analysis of the Most Visible Companies in the Scandinavian CountriesCorporate Reputation Review, 2004
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative FrameworkJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2004
- Corporate Scandal and the Theory of the FirmManagement Communication Quarterly, 2003
- Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?California Management Review, 2003
- Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social ResponsibilityJournal of Marketing Research, 2001
- The Reputation QuotientSM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputationJournal of Brand Management, 2000
- The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product ResponsesJournal of Marketing, 1997
- Building Theories from Case Study ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 1989