The Effects of Barbed Repositioning Pharyngoplasty in Positional and Non-Positional OSA Patients: A Retrospective Analysis
Authors:
- Giovanni CammarotoGiovanni Cammaroto
- Claudio MorettiCMClaudio Moretti
- Giuseppe Di PrinzioGPGiuseppe Di Prinzio
- Isotta CampomagnaniICIsotta Campomagnani
- Giannicola IannellaGIGiannicola Iannella
- Angelo CannavicciACAngelo Cannavicci
- Giuseppe MeccarielloGMGiuseppe Meccariello
- Andrea De VitoAndrea De Vito
- Antonino ManiaciAntonino Maniaci
- Jerome Renè LechienJLJerome Renè Lechien
- Carlos Chiesa-EstombaCCCarlos Chiesa-Estomba
- Christian Calvo-HenriquezCCChristian Calvo-Henriquez
Open Access
- 15 November 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 11 (22) , 6749
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of our retrospective study is evaluating the effectiveness of barbed repositioning pharyngoplasty (BRP) in a consecutive cohort of patients and assessing its impact on positional indexes in order to potentially identify specific obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) phenotypes for patients who might benefit more significantly from this intervention. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study with baseline and follow-up type III sleep tests evaluating the Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), supine AHI, non-supine AHI, oxygen desaturation index (ODI), mean SaO2, percentage of time spent at SaO2 below 90% (CT90), and lowest oxygen saturation (LOS) were performed. The patients were then divided into groups according to Sher’s criteria and Amsterdam Positional OSA Classification (APOC). Parametric and non-parametric tests and univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The study finally included 47 patients. The statistical analysis showed significant improvement in AHI, supine AHI, non-supine AHI, and ODI after surgery. The linear regression showed that high values of baseline AHI, AHI supine, and AHI non supine predict more significant postoperative reductions in AHI, AHI supine, and AHI non supine, respectively. Therapeutic success was achieved in 22 patients out of 47. The logistic regression did not find any independent risk factors for success. The most significant reduction in AHI, supine AHI, and non-supine AHI was observed in the APOC 3 group while the APOC 1 patients experience a substantially lower improvement. CONCLUSIONS: BRP appears to be an effective surgical procedure for the treatment of OSA. The non-positional patients might benefit more from BRP in comparison with positional patients. Moreover, OSA severity should not be considered an absolute contra-indication for this surgical procedure.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Positional modification techniques for supine obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysisSleep Medicine Reviews, 2017
- Positional OSA part 2: retrospective cohort analysis with a new classification system (APOC)Sleep and Breathing, 2015
- Positional OSA part 1: towards a clinical classification system for position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoeaSleep and Breathing, 2014
- Surgical planning after sleep versus awake techniques in patients with obstructive sleep apneaThe Laryngoscope, 2014
- Supine position related obstructive sleep apnea in adults: Pathogenesis and treatmentSleep Medicine Reviews, 2014
- Rules for Scoring Respiratory Events in Sleep: Update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated EventsJournal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2012
- The undervalued potential of positional therapy in position-dependent snoring and obstructive sleep apnea—a review of the literatureSleep and Breathing, 2012
- Effect of Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty on Positional Dependency in Obstructive Sleep ApneaJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 2011
- Clinical Staging for Sleep‐Disordered BreathingOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 2002
- Effect of Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty on Upper Airway Collapsibility in Obstructive Sleep ApneaAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1992