Response–effect compatibility of finger–numeral configurations in arithmetical context
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 63 (1) , 16-22
Abstract
The present study aimed at testing, by means of a response–effect compatibility paradigm, whether finger–numeral representations derived from finger counting may underlie simple arithmetic problem solving in adults. Participants were asked to provide a verbal response to simple additions, which triggered the presentation of the correct (Experiment 1) or an incorrect (Experiment 2) response, displayed either as a configuration of fingers or as a series of rods. Answers were faster with finger configurations than with rods, and only when the finger configuration showed the correct result. These findings support the idea that, even in adults, simple arithmetic operations are still unconsciously underlain by finger–numeral representations.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Finger counting: The missing tool?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2008
- Actions, Words, and NumbersCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2008
- Mind the gap between both hands: Evidence for internal finger-based number representations in children's mental calculationCortex, 2008
- Masked priming effect with canonical finger numeral configurationsExperimental Brain Research, 2007
- Contribution of Hand Motor Circuits to CountingJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2007
- Number magnitude potentiates action judgementsExperimental Brain Research, 2007
- Finger–digit compatibility in Arabic numeral processingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2006
- Effect anticipation and action control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2001
- A Head for FiguresScience, 1999
- The Development of Counting Strategies for Single-Digit AdditionJournal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1987