Sampling errors associated with soil composites used to estimate mean Ra-226 concentrations at an UMTRA remedial-action site

Authors:
  • RGR.O. Gilbert
    R.O. Gilbert
  • KBK.R. Baker
    K.R. Baker
  • RNR.A. Nelson
    R.A. Nelson
  • RMR.H. Miller
    R.H. Miller
  • MMM.L. Miller
    M.L. Miller

Abstract
The decision whether to take additional remedial action (removal of soil) from regions contaminated by uranium mill tailings involves collecting 20 plugs of soil from each 10-m by 10-m plot in the region and analyzing a 500-g portion of the mixed soil for /sup 226/Ra. A soil sampling study was conducted in the windblown mill-tailings flood plain area at Shiprock, New Mexico, to evaluate whether reducing the number of soil plugs to 9 would have any appreciable impact on remedial-action decisions. The results of the Shiprock study are described and used in this paper to develop a simple model of the standard deviation of /sup 226/Ra measurements on composite samples formed from 21 or fewer plugs. This model is used to predict as a function of the number of soil plugs per composite, the percent accuracy with which the mean /sup 226/Ra concentration in surface soil can be estimated, and the probability of making incorrect remedial action decisions on the basis of statistical tests. 8 refs., 15 figs., 9 tabs.