What Do They Think? Undergraduate Perceptions of Student-AI Use
Open Access
- 5 October 2026
- journal article
- Published by International Council for Open and Distance Education in Open Praxis
- Vol. 18 (4) , 702-719
Abstract
Various manifestations of Artificial Intelligence (AI), including Generative AI (GenAI), are being developed and deployed in higher education. The embrace of AI tools, especially those targeted at students, has created questions surrounding the future of teaching and learning. While there is much excitement and hope about AI’s pedagogical potential, the question of how GenAI reshapes assignment completion is not simply one issue among many, but one that raises a fundamental concern with academic integrity. In such context, scholars and policy makers must consider student perspectives, especially ones regarding the way students complete the everyday assignments that provide structure to university life. The AI age necessitates not only a canvasing of general attitudes, but a granular investigation of student perception of peer use of the technology. This study centers on two broad questions, including R1: Whether students think AI encourages dishonesty and, R2: If they perceive that it gives users an unfair advantage. To gain some insight into these questions, current undergraduate students (N = 214) at two public North American universities responded to our exploratory survey. Our research uncovers strong feelings towards AI technology in higher education, which underscores the importance of including all stakeholders—especially undergraduate students—in the broader conversations about the fate of pedagogical achievement and academic integrity in a rapidly changing educational environment.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- How student beliefs about knowledge and knowing influence their satisfaction with assessment and feedbackHigher Education, 2016
- Turning the Question Around: Do Colleges Fail to Meet Students’ Expectations?Research in Higher Education, 2015
- A synergistic approach to turning the tide of grade inflationHigher Education, 2014
- Making the Mark: Are Grades and Deep Learning Related?Research in Higher Education, 2014
- Ethics Instruction and the Perceived Acceptability of CheatingJournal of Business Ethics, 2009
- Situational and Personal Causes of Student CheatingResearch in Higher Education, 2008
- Predictors of cheating and cheating attributions: Does classroom context influence cheating and blame for cheating?European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2008
- Student–faculty Interactions: Dynamics and DeterminantsHigher Education, 2006
- Comparison of student performance in cooperative learning and traditional lecture‐based biochemistry classesBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2005
- The effect of student-faculty interaction on students' educational outcomesResearch in Higher Education, 1982