What drives cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas? An AI-assisted answer using social media
Authors:
- José Carlos Pérez-GirónJPJosé Carlos Pérez-Girón
- Carlos Javier NavarroCNCarlos Javier Navarro
- Akram ElghouatAEAkram Elghouat
- Rohaifa KhaldiRKRohaifa Khaldi
- Domingo LópezDLDomingo López
- Salvador Arenas-CastroSalvador Arenas-Castro
- Ana del ÁguilaAÁAna del Águila
- Ricardo Moreno-LlorcaRMRicardo Moreno-Llorca
- Nuria PistónNPNuria Pistón
- Luis F. RomeroLRLuis F. Romero
- Ana Sofía VazAVAna Sofía Vaz
- Siham TabikSTSiham Tabik
Preprint
Abstract
High mountain protected areas (PAs) are increasingly recognized not only for their role in conserving biodiversity but also for their contribution to the provision of cultural ecosystem services (CES). Despite their relevance, CES remain underrepresented in conservation planning, particularly due to challenges in quantifying their spatial distribution. This study combines geolocated social media data and ecological niche models (ENMs) to assess the spatial patterns and key drivers of CES supply across eight mountain PAs spanning distinct biogeographical regions in Spain and Portugal. Using deep learning techniques to classify more than 200,000 photographs into ten CES categories, we evaluated model performance under two modeling approaches and identified the most influential environmental and social predictors. Most CES categories exhibited good model performance (Boyce index > 0.5), though variation existed across services and regions. Nature & Landscape and Gastronomy CES showed strong associations with park boundaries and human settlements, respectively, while Religious and Cultural CES were spatially linked to culturally significant landmarks.. Our findings demonstrate the potential of combining social media data with ENMs to map CES distributions and reveal both universal and context-dependent drivers. This approach offers valuable insights for integrating CES into PA management and spatial planning, supporting more holistic and culturally inclusive conservation strategies.Keywords
Funding Information
- EarthCul project
- JML received credits from the OpenAI Researcher Access Program.
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using social media and citizen science to assess cultural ecosystem services along riverine landscapesAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2024
- Assessing the socio-demographic representativeness of mobile phone application dataApplied Geography, 2023
- Too many candidates: Embedded covariate selection procedure for species distribution modelling with the covsel R packageEcological Informatics, 2023
- Social media and deep learning reveal specific cultural preferences for biodiversityPeople and Nature, 2023
- Predictive performance of presence‐only species distribution models: a benchmark study with reproducible codeEcological Monographs, 2021
- Using crowdsourced spatial data from Flickr vs. PPGIS for understanding nature's contribution to people in Southern NorwayPeople and Nature, 2020
- Symbolic species as a cultural ecosystem service in the European Alps: insights and open issuesLandscape Ecology, 2018
- Consequences of brown bear viewing tourism: A reviewBiological Conservation, 2017
- Do protected areas networks ensure the supply of ecosystem services? Spatial patterns of two nature reserve systems in semi-arid SpainApplied Geography, 2015
- Ecosystem services in practice: Challenges to real world implementation of ecosystem services across multiple landscapes – A critical reviewApplied Geography, 2013